Skip to main content

Security report for gnc.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gnc.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that blocks content access with a captcha mechanism. This prevents any direct analysis of the website's content, business information, or user interface. The domain is long-established, registered since 1996, indicating a mature and legitimate business presence. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible on the blocked page, nor is any contact information or business description available. The technical infrastructure includes PerimeterX for bot mitigation and Cloudflare for DNS and security services. Due to the content block, the security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a WAF indicates a proactive security approach. Overall, the site’s risk assessment is limited by the lack of accessible content, and strategic recommendations focus on enabling safe access for analysis and ensuring transparency of privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gnc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the domain age and registrar information, gnc.com likely represents a well-established commercial entity. However, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the blocked page. The use of Cloudflare and PerimeterX suggests a focus on protecting digital assets and mitigating automated threats. Without accessible content, insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments are unavailable. The domain’s longevity supports credibility, but further inspection of the live site beyond the WAF is necessary for detailed business intelligence.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare’s WAF and PerimeterX bot mitigation services, indicating a mature security posture aimed at preventing automated attacks and unauthorized access. However, the absence of visible security headers and SSL configuration details limits the assessment. No privacy or incident response policies are found on the blocked page, which are critical for compliance and trust. The domain’s WHOIS data shows clientTransferProhibited status, enhancing domain security. Overall, the security posture appears proactive but lacks transparency due to content blocking.

Recommendations

  1. Enable safe access to website content for legitimate users and security analysts by tuning WAF rules or providing alternative verification methods.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement and expose security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and visible to users to enhance security posture.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare WAF security challenge blocking access with a captcha and 'Access to this page has been denied' message. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, PerimeterX

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PerimeterX
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF with a captcha challenge.
  2. No actual website content is accessible for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the blocked page.
  4. No contact information or business details are available on the page.
  5. Technical stack includes PerimeterX for bot mitigation.
  6. No security headers or SSL details available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data indicates a long-established domain with no privacy protection.
  8. Analysis incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Technical notes

Notes

The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and WAF services and PerimeterX for bot mitigation, indicating a modern approach to security and traffic management. The HTML content is minimal and serves only to deliver a captcha challenge, with no visible CMS or platform detected. No SEO or accessibility features can be evaluated due to content blocking. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed. The domain uses Network Solutions as registrar with a long registration history, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved for DNS security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gnc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gnc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.