Skip to main content

Security report for gmc.lt

UAB GM Consult Group · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB GM Consult Group is a Lithuanian IT company specializing in business process digitalization, automation, and analytics, leveraging Microsoft Dynamics AX, Power BI, SQL, and Oracle technologies. The company targets businesses seeking to optimize and automate processes, particularly in agriculture, logistics, and manufacturing sectors. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client testimonials, positioning them as a niche expert in their market segment. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with a modern but moderate tech stack, providing good mobile responsiveness and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly impacts trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmc.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gmc.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gmc.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as an essential entity in the technology sector, focusing on IT consulting and integration services tailored to specific industry needs. Their competitive advantage lies in deep sector knowledge and expertise in Microsoft and Oracle ecosystems. Revenue likely stems from consulting, integration projects, and ongoing support services. The target customers are medium to large enterprises in agriculture, logistics, and manufacturing. The presence of client testimonials and sector-specific solutions indicates a mature partnership ecosystem and a focus on long-term client relationships. The website's multilingual support (Lithuanian and English) suggests ambitions for broader market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which limits transparency. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
  5. Regularly monitor WHOIS data and ensure domain registration information is transparent and consistent with business identity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB GM Consult Group
VAT number
LT254843515
Registration number
125484357
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB GM Consult Group
Description
Glaudžiai dirbame su verslu: kuriame skaitmeninimo sprendimus, optimizuojame procesus. Integracija su Microsoft Dynamics AX, Power BI, SQL, Oracle produktais. Susisiekime konsultacijai!
Key services
Process automation, Process optimization, Business analytics, IT infrastructure services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, MooTools, Bootstrap 3, Font Awesome, Leaflet, Revolution Slider, Chosen jQuery plugin
Frameworks
Joomla 3.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. Website uses Joomla CMS with common JS libraries
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn
  9. Business information clearly presented in footer
  10. No security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS version 3.1 with a combination of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, MooTools, Bootstrap 3, Font Awesome, Leaflet for maps, and Revolution Slider for UI elements. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and multilingual hreflang attributes. However, the site lacks advanced analytics or tracking tools, which may limit marketing insights. Hosting provider details are not evident. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmc.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmc.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.