Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (AöR) · Government · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.
The Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL) is the official German government authority responsible for regulating the cross-state online gambling market. Its core mission is to ensure player protection, prevent gambling addiction, and enforce compliance among licensed gambling providers. The agency also combats illegal gambling and promotes research in the gambling sector. The website reflects a well-structured, professional government portal with comprehensive information for gambling providers, players, and other stakeholders. It serves as a central coordination point for regulatory matters in Germany's gambling landscape. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with modern frameworks such as UIkit and jQuery, hosted likely on rzone.de infrastructure. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility features, and a clean, professional design. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, CSRF tokens, and frame busting scripts, although explicit security headers could be improved. No signs of tracking or advertising scripts were found, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data aligns with the website's official nature, supporting its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores highly on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility, making it a trustworthy source for gambling regulation in Germany.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention gluecksspiel-behoerde.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for gluecksspiel-behoerde.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with gluecksspiel-behoerde.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gluecksspiel-behoerde.de.