Skip to main content

Security report for glossarium.ch

Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at https://hls-dhs-dss.ch/ghh/ currently serves as a maintenance placeholder page for an XWiki service managed by an administrator named 'Skol'. The content is minimal, indicating temporary unavailability with a promise of improved performance upon return. There is no active business description, contact information, or policies presented on the site. The domain is Swiss (.ch), consistent with the French and English bilingual maintenance message, but uses privacy protection in WHOIS data limiting transparency. Technically, the site is very basic, consisting of static HTML and CSS with no advanced scripts or external resources detected. The CMS is identified as XWiki from the administrator's message. No security headers or SSL details are available from the provided data, and no forms or data collection mechanisms are present. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS information and security headers is a concern. No privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain's privacy protection is common for small or administrative sites but reduces trustworthiness. No suspicious or malicious indicators are detected. Overall, the website is currently non-functional for end users and provides minimal information. The risk is moderate due to lack of security and compliance features, but no active threats or adult content are present. Strategic improvements should focus on enabling HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding contact and incident response information, and enhancing content quality and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glossarium.ch

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention glossarium.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for glossarium.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website does not provide explicit business intelligence data. The domain is Swiss and hosts an XWiki service, likely for internal or organizational use. The administrator's name 'Skol' is mentioned but no company name or sector is identified. The lack of business information, contact details, or marketing content suggests this is a small-scale or internal service rather than a commercial enterprise. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The business model and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and lack of privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are visible. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is common but reduces transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities are evident from the content, but the minimal site footprint limits assessment. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is not demonstrated. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance website content quality and professionalism to improve trust and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is currently a maintenance placeholder page indicating the service is temporarily unavailable for intervention and will return faster and more stable. The administrator identifies as 'Skol' managing an XWiki service.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
XWiki
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently a maintenance placeholder with no active content or services.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms available.
  4. No external links or social media references present.
  5. No scripts or advanced technologies detected beyond basic HTML and CSS.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available.
  7. WHOIS data indicates privacy protection, limiting registrant transparency.
  8. Content is safe with no adult or questionable material.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on XWiki, a known wiki platform, but currently only displays a static maintenance page with minimal HTML and CSS. No JavaScript libraries, analytics, or external resources are detected. The site lacks meta tags beyond basic charset and title, and no SEO or accessibility features are evident. Hosting provider and performance metrics are not available. The technical implementation is basic and could be modernized with responsive design, improved metadata, and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glossarium.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glossarium.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.