Skip to main content

Security report for global-office.na

global office GmbH · Telecommunications · Germany

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

global office GmbH is a German-based service provider specializing in telephone answering, office, and secretarial services. The company targets businesses requiring professional and empathetic customer communication, serving sectors such as public authorities, hospitality, and automotive dealerships. Their market position is supported by a sizable team of over 450 telephone agents and multiple locations, emphasizing personalized service and customer satisfaction. The website content is well-structured, professional, and includes multimedia testimonials to reinforce trust. Technically, the website is built on the Contao CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper, and Tiny Slider to enhance user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. SEO is basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response information, and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen the company's digital maturity and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching global-office.na

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention global-office.na, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for global-office.na right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the telecommunications and business services sectors, focusing on outsourced telephone and office support. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized, empathetic customer interaction and a broad service portfolio including booking, order management, and appointment scheduling. The business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and larger enterprises needing reliable call handling. The presence of sister domains for Germany and Austria indicates a regional expansion strategy. Customer testimonials and multimedia content suggest a focus on reputation and client satisfaction. The lack of detailed founding year or parent company information limits deeper business intelligence but the medium size and multiple locations imply established operations.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and preparedness. The lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms also reduces compliance with best practices and GDPR requirements. No signs of malware or phishing were detected. The company should prioritize publishing security documentation and implementing cookie consent to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
  5. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
global office GmbH
Description
global office GmbH offers telephone answering services, office services, and secretarial services with a focus on personal, empathetic, and flexible customer communication. They serve various sectors including public authorities, hotels, and car dealerships.
Key services
Telephone answering service, Office service, Secretarial service, Appointment scheduling, Order and booking management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Contao CMS, Tiny Slider, Swiper, Bootstrap, Mmenu, Colorbox, Tablesorter, Handorgel
Frameworks
Contao Open Source CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and targets business customers in Germany and neighboring countries.
  3. The site uses a modern CMS (Contao) with multiple JavaScript libraries for UI and UX.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  5. Contact information is provided primarily via email and contact forms; no phone number explicitly labeled found.
  6. Social media presence is active on Instagram, Facebook, Xing, and YouTube.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard libraries.
  10. Website content is professional and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Contao CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Swiper, Tiny Slider, and Bootstrap for responsive design. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses CSS for styling with responsive layouts. Performance is moderate with no critical errors or broken elements detected. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features such as keyboard navigable menus and ARIA roles. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks Open Graph or Twitter Card metadata. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with global-office.na. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review global-office.na.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.