Skip to main content

Security report for global-cbc.com

CBC株式会社 · Other · Japan

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CBC Co., Ltd. is a Japanese trading company specializing in a broad range of sectors including chemicals, resins, electronic materials, pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemicals, optical information devices, security, mobile phones, and solar power generation. The company positions itself as a forward-looking enterprise aiming to shape the future through its diversified trading activities. The website content reflects a professional business presence targeting general audiences and industry partners. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. It employs a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust, indicating awareness of privacy compliance requirements. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no significant issues detected in the provided content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response information. No forms or contact details were found in the analyzed content, which limits direct user engagement and support transparency. The absence of WHOIS data reduces confidence in domain legitimacy, although the website itself appears professional and trustworthy. Overall, CBC Co., Ltd.'s website presents a credible business front with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency of contact and compliance information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching global-cbc.com

This scan found 8 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
91
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention global-cbc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for global-cbc.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CBC operates as a trading company in Japan with a diversified portfolio spanning chemicals, pharmaceuticals, electronics, and renewable energy sectors. The business model focuses on B2B trading and distribution of specialized materials and devices. The company targets industrial clients and partners in technology and manufacturing sectors. The website's structured data and metadata reinforce its market positioning as a comprehensive trading firm. No direct revenue streams or partnership domains were identified from the content. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a professional digital presence, suggesting stable market operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs were found, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of visible forms reduces attack surface but also limits user interaction. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and clearer contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy, terms of service, and security incident response information on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add verified company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to facilitate user trust and support.
  4. Regularly audit and update all third-party libraries and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a verified registrar to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CBC株式会社
Description
Trading company that will shape the future, chemicals, resins, electronic materials, pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemicals, living, optical information devices, security, mobile phones, solar power generation.
Key services
chemicals, resins, electronic materials, pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemicals, living, optical information devices, security, mobile phones, solar power generation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is business-oriented, describing a trading company with diverse sectors.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable or not publicly accessible, limiting domain trust assessment.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with standard SEO and analytics tools.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. It employs OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and resources from a CDN, which supports performance optimization. The HTML structure includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media integration via Open Graph and Twitter Cards. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No forms or interactive elements were detected in the analyzed content, limiting data collection. Hosting provider details were not identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with global-cbc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review global-cbc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.