Skip to main content

Security report for glitnoraffiliates.com

Glitnor Services Ltd. · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glitnor Affiliates is a specialized affiliate marketing business operating in the iGaming sector, promoting multiple casino brands globally. Founded in 2018 by industry veterans, the company focuses on building trusted partnerships and delivering quality brand promotion services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at affiliate marketers and partners. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and Avia framework, with modern web technologies and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policies are published. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional affiliate marketing platform with room for security and compliance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glitnoraffiliates.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an emerging player in the affiliate marketing space for online casinos, leveraging multiple brands to capture a global audience. Its business model relies on affiliate commissions and rewards, targeting affiliate marketers as its primary customers. The presence of testimonials and a dedicated rewards program indicates a focus on partner engagement and retention. The company appears to be small-sized but growing, with a clear strategy to expand market reach. The parent company, Glitnor Services Ltd., is referenced, suggesting a structured corporate entity. The website content and updates demonstrate active engagement with the iGaming community and industry events.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a baseline of privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy pages are found, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML and uses standard WordPress security practices. There is no evidence of vulnerable libraries or insecure forms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding phone contact information and physical address to improve business credibility and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glitnor Services Ltd.
Description
Glitnor Affiliates is an affiliate marketing business formed in 2018 by industry veterans, focusing on quality brands, innovation, and trusted partnerships in the iGaming sector. They promote multiple casino brands globally and aim to secure a top position in the industry.
Key services
Affiliate marketing, Brand promotion, Affiliate rewards and commissions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Enfold Theme, jQuery, Google Fonts (Roboto), MediaElement.js
Frameworks
Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on affiliate marketing for iGaming brands.
  3. Multiple brands promoted with dedicated portfolio pages.
  4. Good use of cookie consent and privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found; contact primarily via email and forms.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No visible use of analytics or tracking pixels detected in HTML.
  8. Website uses WordPress with Enfold theme and Avia framework.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with a popular commercial theme (Enfold) and Avia framework. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO fundamentals including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The hosting appears to be with GoDaddy, inferred from registrar and nameservers. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking services embedded. The site uses AJAX forms for email subscription and contact, collecting basic user data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with modern security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glitnoraffiliates.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glitnoraffiliates.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.