Skip to main content

Security report for glips.eu

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website glips.eu serves as an informational resource focused on web design principles and tips, primarily targeting a general audience interested in creating quality websites. The content is presented in Czech and includes educational text, images, and embedded video content. The site appears to be a small-scale informational platform without commercial transactions or direct contact information. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, and embedded YouTube videos. It includes a third-party tracking script from redistats.com but lacks privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, which may raise compliance concerns. Security posture is minimal with no evident security headers or HTTPS status visible from the data provided. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policies, which is typical for .eu domains, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site is functional and informative but lacks key compliance and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glips.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glips.eu operates as a niche informational website in the technology sector, specifically web design education. It targets individuals or small businesses interested in improving their web presence. The business model is content-driven without evident monetization or e-commerce. The site redirects users to a partner domain (lukaspavelec.cz) for further content, indicating a possible partnership or content migration. The lack of contact details and business registration information limits transparency and trust signals. The site’s small size and limited scope suggest a modest market presence focused on educational content rather than commercial services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is provided. The presence of a third-party tracking script without consent mechanisms indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Include clear contact information and a security incident response contact to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Na našich stránkách najdete užitečné informace a tipy týkající se web designu a samotné tvorby webových stránek. Zaujměte na první pohled!
Key services
web design tips, web design principles, educational content about web design
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts, YouTube embed, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
redistats.com
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
redistats.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers present.
  4. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policy.
  5. Site uses external resources for fonts, images, and tracking.
  6. Tracking script from redistats.com is present, but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. Content is in Czech language focused on web design education.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected on the page.
  9. No social media links or company contact details found.
  10. Site redirects users to another domain for further content (lukaspavelec.cz).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technical stack with static HTML and CSS, Google Fonts, and embedded YouTube content. It lacks a CMS or advanced frameworks, indicating a simple hosting environment. Performance is moderate with external image hosting and embedded media. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, no advanced accessibility features or SEO optimizations are evident. The use of a third-party tracking script without consent mechanisms is a technical and compliance risk. Hosting provider and SSL status are not determinable from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glips.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glips.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.