Skip to main content

Security report for glip.com

RingCentral · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RingCentral is a leading enterprise technology company specializing in cloud communications, including video conferencing, team messaging, and business phone systems. Their website reflects a mature, professional digital presence with comprehensive product offerings targeting businesses of all sizes, from startups to large enterprises. The company leverages modern web technologies and compliance tools to deliver a seamless user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not prominently published. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy given the brand recognition and website quality.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of glip.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glip.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
70
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RingCentral operates a SaaS subscription model focused on unified communications and collaboration solutions. Their market position is strong as a recognized leader in cloud communications, serving diverse industries and business sizes. The company maintains a broad partner ecosystem and offers extensive integrations and APIs. The website content and navigation are designed to support sales, support, and partner engagement effectively. The presence of certifications like ISO 27001 and SOC 2 further reinforce their commitment to security and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and use of consent management platforms like OneTrust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness communication. The WHOIS data inconsistency is a minor concern but likely due to privacy protection or technical reasons rather than malicious intent.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer or privacy team.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Maintain updated WHOIS records or clarify privacy protection to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RingCentral
Description
RingCentral provides unlimited, high-quality video meetings with HD audio, screen sharing, and team messaging. They offer a free trial and a suite of communication and collaboration products.
Key services
Video conferencing, Team messaging, Business phone system, AI-powered communication solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Firebase, OneTrust, ZoomInfo, Lottie, Adobe Launch
Frameworks
React (likely), Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Platforms
Firebase, YouTube (video embedding)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Launch, ZoomInfo, Invoca
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust, ZoomInfo, Invoca, Adobe Launch
Marketing tools
OneTrust, Adobe Launch, ZoomInfo, Invoca
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong branding and professional design
  3. Comprehensive product and solution offerings
  4. Use of modern web technologies and compliance tools
  5. Clear contact information and support links
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not necessarily malicious
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS with a modern JavaScript stack and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, consent management, and marketing. Performance is optimized with preloading fonts and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with structured data for SEO. The technical infrastructure supports a fast, reliable user experience with good SEO and accessibility practices. Opportunities exist to further enhance security transparency and reduce reliance on multiple third-party tracking scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.