Skip to main content

Security report for glelectronic.space

G.L.Electronic · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

G.L.Electronic is a Czech aerospace technology company specializing in high-reliability electronic components and cable harnesses for space missions. The company is actively involved in major European space programs such as the Copernicus Sentinel missions, reusable rocket development under ESA's FLPP program, and the ARIEL exoplanet telescope project. Their business model focuses on B2B contracts with space agencies and aerospace manufacturers, positioning them as a niche but important player in the European aerospace supply chain. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with detailed project descriptions targeting aerospace industry stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins like WPBakery Page Builder and jQuery. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and moderate performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility are adequate but could be improved. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but lacks advanced structured data. Analytics usage includes Google Analytics with moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Contact information is minimal, with no explicit emails or phone numbers for support or incident response. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but has compliance and security gaps that should be addressed to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glelectronic.space

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

G.L.Electronic operates in the aerospace technology sector, focusing on manufacturing and assembling electronic components for space missions. Their involvement in ESA and European Commission projects like Copernicus, FLPP, and SALTO indicates strong partnerships and a reputable market position. The company targets aerospace agencies and manufacturers requiring high-reliability electronics. Their business model is project-based B2B contracting with a medium-sized company profile. The website content and external links to Airbus, ESA, and European projects reinforce their credibility and strategic positioning within the European aerospace ecosystem. Growth indicators include participation in cutting-edge reusable rocket technology and exoplanet research missions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file reduces the ability for external parties to report security issues responsibly. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, which may expose the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure process to improve incident response and external security collaboration.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G.L.Electronic
Description
G.L.Electronic is a Czech company specializing in aerospace technologies, providing high-reliability electronic solutions and cable harnesses for space missions and aerospace projects. They are involved in major European space programs such as Copernicus Sentinel missions, reusable rocket development, and exoplanet observation telescopes.
Key services
Manufacturing and assembly of cable harnesses, Electronic card development and testing, Material procurement and testing for aerospace applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, WPBakery Page Builder, Fancybox, Superfish
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred JavaScript loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional aerospace technology company site with detailed project descriptions.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  5. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security issues.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  8. No incident response or security contact information provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements. It loads Google Fonts and employs Fancybox for media display. The site uses deferred JavaScript loading for performance optimization. While the site is mobile responsive and has a consistent design, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is implemented at a basic level with meta tags and canonical URLs but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD for business or organization schema. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glelectronic.space. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glelectronic.space.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.