Skip to main content

Security report for gldn.studio

GLDN Studio · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GLDN Studio is a small creative studio operating an e-commerce platform, likely focused on digital or artistic collections, as indicated by references to a 'solana' category. The website is built on the Webflow platform and integrates modern payment solutions such as Stripe and PayPal, supporting a professional online shopping experience. The site includes tracking and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Pinterest Tag, indicating a moderate level of digital marketing maturity. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack with Webflow CMS, jQuery, and Google Fonts, hosted on Webflow's CDN infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and shows good design and navigation clarity. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. Security posture is decent with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for small businesses, and no suspicious patterns were detected. However, the absence of contact information and privacy compliance documentation reduces trust and compliance scores. Overall, GLDN Studio presents as a legitimate small e-commerce creative business with a solid technical foundation but needs to enhance privacy compliance and contact transparency to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gldn.studio

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GLDN Studio operates in the e-commerce sector with a focus on creative or digital collections, possibly linked to blockchain or NFT themes given the 'solana' category reference. The business model combines product sales with studio branding and information. The company targets a general audience interested in unique or artistic products. The use of Stripe and PayPal indicates a standard revenue stream through online payments. The partnership ecosystem includes major payment processors and marketing platforms but no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified. Growth indicators are not explicit, and the company appears to be a small, boutique operation with consistent branding and good digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot activity. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which is a gap that should be addressed to improve protection against common web attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security issues. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with recommendations to enhance policy transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident reporting channels to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GLDN Studio
Description
GLDN Studio appears to be a creative studio offering a shop with collections and studio information. The site references a category 'solana' suggesting a possible focus on digital or blockchain-related products or themes.
Key services
Shop digital or physical collections, Studio information and branding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow, Google Fonts (Newsreader), Pinterest Tag, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Stripe.js, PayPal SDK
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Pinterest Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pinterest Tag
Marketing tools
Pinterest Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  4. Use of modern e-commerce payment integrations (Stripe, PayPal).
  5. Use of Google reCAPTCHA indicates some bot protection on forms.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  8. Website uses Webflow CMS and hosting platform.
  9. No security headers detected in the HTML content; likely set at server level but not visible here.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags beyond basic title tags found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Payment processing is handled via Stripe and PayPal SDKs, integrated securely with live keys. Marketing and analytics tools include Google Analytics and Pinterest Tag, enabling user behavior tracking and retargeting. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring moderate performance and global availability. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and skip links implemented. No structured data or advanced SEO meta tags were found, indicating potential for SEO improvements. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gldn.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gldn.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.