Skip to main content

Security report for glastech.lv

Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glastech.lv is a Latvian company specializing in the glass industry with over 20 years of experience. They offer a broad range of products and services including glass processing equipment, glass package production machinery, aluminum profile processing tools, glass transportation equipment, and related services including trade in used equipment. The website targets businesses in the manufacturing and glass processing sectors, operating primarily in Latvia. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and uses common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile optimized and provides clear navigation and contact information. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but no active cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, which slightly reduces trust but the site content and contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional and functional with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glastech.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glastech.lv operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on glass industry equipment and services. Their business model is B2B, selling industrial equipment and materials to companies involved in glass processing and aluminum profile manufacturing. The company appears established with a claimed history of over 20 years, serving a niche market in Latvia. Their product range and service offerings suggest a comprehensive solution provider in their sector. The website content and structure indicate a focus on professional clients rather than consumers. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. The company maintains standard business information and legal pages, supporting a credible market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, which limits transparency in handling security incidents. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with policies present but lacks an active cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be enhanced to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add an incident response or security policy page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy controls.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Company with over 20 years in the glass industry offering glass processing equipment, glass package production equipment, instruments for working with glass, raw materials for glass package production, glass lamination films, aluminum profile processing equipment, window and door production equipment, software and production planning, instruments and materials, glass transportation equipment, lifting devices, warehouse solutions, and service including trade with used equipment.
Key services
Glass processing equipment, Glass package production equipment, Aluminum profile processing equipment, Glass transportation equipment, Service and used equipment sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Select2
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce site focused on glass industry equipment and services
  2. Content is in Latvian language
  3. Contact info is clearly displayed in header and footer
  4. Privacy policy, terms of service, and cookie policy pages exist
  5. No visible security.txt or incident response info
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  7. HTTPS is enabled and Google reCAPTCHA is used
  8. No obvious security headers detected
  9. No adult or questionable content found
  10. Site uses multiple plugins and scripts typical for WordPress e-commerce
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses WPBakery Page Builder for layout management and includes common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Select2. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for form security. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google fonts. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators but the site is mobile responsive and accessible. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The hosting provider is not identified from the content. The site does not expose any sensitive information in the HTML source. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small to medium WordPress e-commerce site with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glastech.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glastech.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.