Skip to main content

Security report for glammatic.com

Glammatic · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glammatic is a specialized technology company offering an all-in-one marketing platform tailored for beauty salons. Their services include salon website building, social media marketing, branding, and multi-location salon solutions. The company targets salon owners seeking to enhance their online presence, increase bookings, and boost retail sales. The website demonstrates a professional and modern design with clear navigation and a focus on user engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for consent management. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and partner ecosystem suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on content quality and technical implementation but needs improvements in privacy compliance and business credibility transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glammatic.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
98
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glammatic positions itself as a niche SaaS provider in the salon marketing technology sector, leveraging partnerships with well-known industry players to enhance credibility. Their business model revolves around subscription-based software services that integrate website building, SEO automation, and digital assistant features. The company targets small to medium-sized salon businesses, including multi-location chains, aiming to convert online browsers into paying clients. The presence of trusted partner logos and active social media channels indicates a growing ecosystem and market presence. However, the lack of explicit company registration and privacy policies may hinder trust among more cautious customers. The company appears to focus on growth through digital marketing and strategic partnerships.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the site lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program was found, which are important for mature security posture and compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header configurations and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glammatic
Description
All-in-One Marketing Platform for Salons helping established salons maximize online presence, increase bookings, and engage clients effortlessly.
Key services
Salon website builder, Social media marketing, Branding, Multi-location salon website software, Automated SEO, Digital front desk assistant, Google Business management, Smart service menu technology
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, MetaSlider plugin, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes consent, Intl-Tel-Input, Prism analytics
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Prism
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Prism
Marketing tools
CookieYes, MetaSlider
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and modern WordPress-based site focused on salon marketing solutions.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and active.
  5. Contact phone number +1-857-856-7707 found in header.
  6. Multiple trusted partner logos displayed indicating business relationships.
  7. Use of multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered, which is a significant concern.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern plugins like MetaSlider and CookieYes for enhanced functionality. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Prism for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and performance is moderate, suggesting room for optimization. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility and security configurations. The use of multiple external domains for scripts and images is standard but requires ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glammatic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glammatic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.