Skip to main content

Security report for gladiolapluss.lv

Gladiola Pluss · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gladiola Pluss is a niche Latvian website dedicated to showcasing and offering a curated collection of gladiolus flower varieties, including award-winning and exhibition champion types recognized regionally and internationally. The site targets gardening enthusiasts and florists interested in high-quality gladiolus varieties suitable for cut flowers and bouquets. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the The7 theme and Visual Composer, with standard plugins such as Contact Form 7, and is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, impacting trust assessment. Overall, the site provides good content quality and user experience but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gladiolapluss.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a specialized online platform focusing on gladiolus varieties, serving a small but dedicated market segment primarily in Latvia and neighboring countries. Its competitive advantage lies in offering well-curated, high-quality flower varieties with a reputation in multiple countries. The business model appears informational with catalog offerings, possibly supporting direct orders or inquiries. There is no evidence of large-scale commercial operations or partnerships. The site’s content and structure suggest a small-sized operation with a focused target audience of gardeners and florists. The lack of detailed business registration or contact information limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response policies, or security certifications was found. The site does not display privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond core WordPress plugins were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response mechanisms to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for business credibility and incident response.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gladiola Pluss
Description
Gladiola Pluss is a website dedicated to showcasing and offering a collection of gladiolus flower varieties. It features exhibition champions, leaders, and award-winning varieties appreciated in countries including Czechia, Lithuania, Latvia, Ukraine, USA, Canada, and Russia. The site targets gladiolus enthusiasts and growers, providing information on well-growing, productive, and healthy varieties suitable for cut flowers and bouquets, spanning early to mid-late blooming periods.
Key services
Showcasing gladiolus varieties, Providing cultivation and ordering information, Offering a catalog for 2025
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Visual Composer, The7 Theme, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site focused on gladiolus flower varieties.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local and regional audience.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the content.
  6. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress core and plugins.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  10. Site navigation is clear with categorized collections and informational pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the The7 theme and Visual Composer page builder, indicating a standard and widely supported technical infrastructure. The use of jQuery and Contact Form 7 plugins is typical for WordPress sites. The site loads external resources such as Google Fonts and WordPress emoji scripts. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, and navigation is clear. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no analytics tools were detected. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business site but could benefit from performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gladiolapluss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gladiolapluss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.