Skip to main content

Security report for gjerholm.no

Tibe AS · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

TIBE Oslo is a creative agency specializing in visual solutions and creative concepts designed to deliver impactful results. The company operates as part of a network of bureaus across Norway, offering services such as graphic design, strategy, and advisory to business clients seeking to enhance their brand presence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting organizations and businesses in need of creative communication services. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and TermsFeed for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and uses SVG graphics and lazy loading for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected, and some security headers are missing, which could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection slightly reduces trust but is common for small businesses. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and explicit incident response contact information. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website presenting a trustworthy and professional front for a legitimate business. Strategic recommendations include implementing additional security headers, publishing a security policy, and providing clearer contact information for security incidents to further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gjerholm.no

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
55
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

TIBE Oslo holds a regional market position as a creative agency within Norway, operating alongside sister bureaus in Molde, Trondheim, Atlantic, and Labs. Their business model focuses on delivering tailored visual and strategic communication services to organizations. The company targets business clients seeking to elevate their brand through creative concepts and graphic design. The website content and structured data confirm a small-sized entity with a clear focus on creative services. The lack of detailed financial or founding data limits deeper revenue or growth analysis. The partnership ecosystem is internal among the TIBE bureaus, with no external partnerships explicitly identified. The company demonstrates a consistent branding approach and compliance with privacy regulations, supporting a credible market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a robust cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR compliance. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection, which is typical for small businesses but reduces transparency. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy or incident response page with clear contact information for reporting security issues.
  3. Enhance contact information visibility on the website, including verified company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues arise from external dependencies.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS information or providing transparency statements to improve trustworthiness and domain legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tibe AS
Description
TIBE Oslo creates visual solutions and creative concepts that deliver results. They offer services in graphic design, strategy, and advisory, targeting clients who want to enhance their brand.
Key services
Visual solutions, Creative concepts, Graphic design, Strategy and advisory
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, TermsFeed Cookie Consent, SVG graphics, Lazy loading images
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie consent compliance observed.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and good SEO practices.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. Business information is consistent with a creative agency in Norway.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end approach with SVG graphics, lazy loading images, and asynchronous loading of scripts such as Google Tag Manager and TermsFeed cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and structured data using JSON-LD with LocalBusiness schema. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with deferred and async script loading. Accessibility is basic but present. The lack of detected security headers and hosting provider information suggests potential technical debt or areas for infrastructure improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gjerholm.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gjerholm.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.