Skip to main content

Security report for gitlab.com

GitLab Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GitLab Inc. operates a leading AI-powered DevSecOps platform that integrates planning, development, security, and operations into a single application. The company targets developers, DevOps, and security teams in enterprises, offering a SaaS model that enhances secure code delivery and collaboration. The website reflects a mature enterprise presence with comprehensive content, professional design, and consistent branding. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools, and demonstrates excellent performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong, with HTTPS enforcement, CSP headers, and clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gitlab.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gitlab.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GitLab holds a strong market position as a comprehensive DevSecOps platform provider, leveraging AI to differentiate its offerings. The business model is SaaS-based, focusing on enterprise customers requiring integrated development and security workflows. The company maintains certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, enhancing trust. Its ecosystem includes partnerships with marketing and analytics providers, and it actively promotes security best practices. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement effectively, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The security maturity level is high, with multiple security headers, SSL/TLS properly configured, and a clear vulnerability disclosure program. The presence of dedicated security contacts and incident response information indicates readiness for security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies. Recommendations include continuous library updates, enhanced MFA, and ongoing security audits to maintain and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement continuous monitoring and automated dependency vulnerability scanning to promptly address third-party library risks.
  2. Enhance multi-factor authentication enforcement for all user accounts to reduce risk of unauthorized access.
  3. Regularly review and tighten Content Security Policy rules to mitigate emerging web-based threats.
  4. Maintain transparent and detailed data retention policies accessible to users to strengthen privacy compliance.
  5. Conduct periodic penetration testing and security awareness training to reinforce security culture and resilience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GitLab Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GitLab Inc.
Description
From planning to production, bring teams together in one application. Ship secure code more efficiently to deliver value faster.
Key services
DevSecOps platform, AI-powered code analysis, CI/CD pipelines, Security scanning, Collaboration tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, OneTrust, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Optimizely
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Platforms
SaaS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Security incident response contact
  • Vulnerability disclosure program

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Marketo Munchkin, Bizible
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, Bizible
Marketing tools
Marketo, Optimizely, Mutiny
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust integration
  3. Multiple security and compliance certifications referenced
  4. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  5. Use of modern web technologies and marketing tools
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security issues found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework stack (Vue.js, Nuxt.js) with server-side rendering for performance. It uses industry-standard marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, and Optimizely, integrated with a consent management platform (OneTrust) for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit but likely cloud-based. Performance is fast with no broken elements detected. Technical risks are minimal but require ongoing maintenance of third-party dependencies and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 +3Low27 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gitlab.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gitlab.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.