Skip to main content

Security report for gimenei.lv

Biedrība "Radošais psiholoģijas centrs Ģimenei" · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a Latvian non-profit organization named "Biedrība Radošais psiholoģijas centrs Ģimenei" that provides psychological counseling and therapy services focused on families, children, and adults. The organization also offers educational programs for educators and social workers. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets a local Latvian audience with clear service descriptions and team member information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as Bootstrap and jQuery, and it uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. However, it lacks privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response contact information, which are important for compliance and security posture. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe, with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gimenei.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small non-profit entity in the psychological services sector within Latvia. Its market position is local and specialized, focusing on family and individual therapy, including systemic family therapy and Jungian analytical psychotherapy. The business model relies on direct service provision and educational programs, likely funded partially by local government or grants. The website content reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed service offerings and a dedicated team. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The absence of privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The site does not appear to use tracking or advertising scripts that could introduce privacy risks. Regular updates and security hardening are recommended to improve resilience and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create a security.txt file and provide incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding email contact addresses for general inquiries and security-related communications to improve user trust and support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Biedrība "Radošais psiholoģijas centrs Ģimenei"
Registration number
LV40008162974
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība "Radošais psiholoģijas centrs Ģimenei"
Description
Radošais psiholoģijas centrs Ģimenei sniedz psiholoģisko palīdzību ģimenēm un piedāvā tālākizglītības programmas pedagogiem, sociālajiem pedagogiem un sociālajiem darbiniekiem. Mērķis ir atbalstīt personības attīstību un ģimenes kā sistēmas veselumu.
Key services
Psiholoģiskā konsultēšana, Ģimenes psihoterapija, Pasaku terapija, Psihodrāma, Psihoorganiskā analīze, Berta Helingera sistēmfenomenoloģiskā pieeja, Junga analītiskā psihoterapija, Psiholoģiskā palīdzība vardarbībā cietušajiem, Supervīzijas sociālajiem darbiniekiem, Psiholoģiskā izpēte un atzinumu sagatavošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 3.3.6, Font Awesome 4.5.0, Owl Carousel 2.0.0, PHP (implied by WordPress)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a Latvian psychological center focused on family services.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear structure and navigation.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  4. Contact information includes physical address and multiple phone numbers for team members.
  5. No email addresses or social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection fields present.
  7. No security.txt or incident response contact information found.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and theme scripts.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and modern libraries.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform version 6.7.2, using Bootstrap 3.3.6 for responsive design, jQuery 3.7.1 for scripting, and Font Awesome 4.5.0 for icons. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Owl Carousel for content sliders. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No advanced analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a focus on content and service presentation rather than aggressive marketing or tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gimenei.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gimenei.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.