Skip to main content

Security report for gimek.hu

G.I. Industrial Holding SpA · Manufacturing · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gimek.hu represents a medium-sized manufacturing business under the multinational G.I. Industrial Holding Group, specializing in industrial and commercial cooling solutions. The company leverages four brands to deliver air conditioning, air handling, and cooling systems for diverse industrial applications. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with consistent branding and clear business focus on industrial clients. Technically, the site uses modern front-end libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Slick Carousel, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and user experience. However, some accessibility and SEO optimizations could be improved. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and basic privacy policies in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gimek.hu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on industrial cooling and HVAC solutions. It holds a solid market position as part of a multinational group with multiple brands, targeting commercial and industrial customers. The business model centers on manufacturing and marketing specialized cooling products. The presence of related domains and a parent company website indicates a structured corporate ecosystem. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly centralized through the parent company. The company shows moderate digital maturity with room for growth in security and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with Google Analytics configured for IP anonymization, indicating attention to privacy. However, no security headers were detected, and there is no visible incident response or security policy documentation. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose GDPR compliance risks. No forms or data collection points were found on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The overall security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, explicit incident response policies, and vulnerability disclosure to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
G.I. Industrial Holding SpA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G.I. Industrial Holding SpA
Description
With its 40 years of experience and 4 brands -CLINT, KTK, MONTAIR, NOVAIR- the Multinational Group G.I. Holding manufactures and markets a complete range of solutions for comfort and industrial cooling: air conditioning and air handling systems in commercial or industrial buildings, cooling systems for server rooms and industrial processes.
Key services
air conditioning systems, air handling systems, cooling systems for server rooms, industrial process cooling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, FontAwesome 5.3.1, Slick Carousel, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics configured with IP anonymization

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear corporate branding.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. No terms of service or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage or footer.
  6. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn and YouTube.
  7. Use of modern front-end libraries and frameworks.
  8. No visible forms or data collection fields on the homepage.
  9. SSL is enabled and Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization.
  10. No security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.4.1, FontAwesome 5.3.1, Slick Carousel, and Fancybox. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags beyond basic meta description. No forms or interactive data collection elements were found on the homepage, indicating a static content approach. Technical debt appears low but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and SEO markup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gimek.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gimek.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.