Skip to main content

Security report for gima.lt

UAB Gima Industry · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Gima Industry is a Lithuanian small business specializing in industrial product marking solutions. Their offerings include laser and inkjet marking printers, thermal transfer and label printers, inks, solvents, labels, stickers, spare parts, and servicing. The company targets industrial and manufacturing clients requiring marking and labeling equipment and consumables. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with a commercial theme and common plugins, providing a good user experience and clear navigation. The site is mobile optimized and includes relevant business content and contact information, including a physical address and phone number. However, no privacy or cookie policies are present, and no social media presence is linked.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gima.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche manufacturing sector focused on marking and labeling technology. Their business model is B2B, supplying equipment and consumables along with maintenance services. The website content and embedded video suggest a regional market focus in Lithuania. The lack of WHOIS data limits verification of domain legitimacy, but the presence of detailed contact info and professional presentation supports credibility. The absence of certifications or security policies indicates room for maturity improvements. No analytics or advertising networks are detected, indicating minimal tracking and marketing automation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a strong security baseline. However, no HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, representing a security improvement opportunity. The contact form uses a popular WordPress plugin, but no explicit anti-spam or security measures are visible. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are found in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting security transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve security posture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide social media or third-party trust signals to boost credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Gima Industry
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Gima Industry
Description
UAB „Gima Industry” operates in the product marking sector, supplying laser and inkjet marking printers, thermal transfer and label printers, inks, solvents, labels, stickers, and other materials. They also provide spare parts and servicing for industrial printers.
Key services
Sales of marking printers (laser, inkjet, thermal transfer), Supply of inks, solvents, labels, and stickers, Provision of spare parts, Service, repair, and maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Google Maps Widget, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Sydney WordPress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; no registrar or registration dates extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and a commercial theme.
  7. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond basic contact form usage.
  9. Content is in Lithuanian language targeting local industrial clients.
  10. No social media links found on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Sydney theme and common plugins like Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7. It uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. Google Maps widget is embedded for location display. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as googleapis.com and youtube.com. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive layouts. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. No advanced analytics or marketing automation tools are detected, indicating a straightforward technical setup with limited complexity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gima.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gima.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.