Skip to main content

Security report for gigaserver.cz

Seonet Multimedia s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GIGASERVER.CZ, operated by Seonet Multimedia s.r.o., is a well-established Czech web hosting and domain registration provider targeting customers primarily in the Czech Republic. The company offers a range of services including domain registration, various web hosting plans, dedicated servers, SSL certificates, and 24/7 customer support. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on reliability and customer service, boasting a 99.99% uptime guarantee and a strong customer rating. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and monitoring tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Sentry for error tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and interactive features like domain availability checks and pricing calculators. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers are not evident, and no privacy policy is directly found on the main page. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has implemented cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline compliance with privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS data due to registry or privacy protection limits domain age verification, but the business claims over 15 years of market presence. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the site maintains a safe content rating. Overall, GIGASERVER.CZ presents a credible and professional hosting service with moderate to good technical and security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy policy transparency and security header implementation would enhance compliance and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gigaserver.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GIGASERVER.CZ operates in the competitive Czech web hosting market, leveraging over 15 years of experience to maintain a medium-sized business profile. Its competitive advantages include low pricing starting at 7 Kč per month, high service availability, and 24/7 customer support. The company targets small to medium businesses and individuals seeking reliable domain and hosting services. Revenue streams likely include domain registrations, hosting subscriptions, SSL certificates, and value-added services. The presence of a partner program and knowledge base supports customer engagement and growth. The company is affiliated with recognized registries such as CZ.NIC and EURid, enhancing market credibility. Strategic partnerships with related domains and a strong social media presence support marketing and customer acquisition efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of advanced error monitoring via Sentry. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of privacy compliance requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could impact transparency and readiness. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration transparency but is likely due to privacy protection. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a hosting provider but would benefit from enhanced policy publication and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive and easily accessible privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Develop and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and security culture.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with accessibility standards and broaden user inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Seonet Multimedia s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seonet Multimedia s.r.o.
Description
Domény a webhostingové centrum pro ČR. Webhosting již od 7 Kč měsíčně, 99,99% dostupnost a nonstop podpora. Zaregistrujte své stránky s GIGASERVER.CZ ještě dnes.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, Dedicated servers, SSL certificates, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Sentry (error monitoring), Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Umami
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Umami
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy protection or registry policy
  3. Strong presence of tracking and analytics tools with cookie consent implemented
  4. Clear business contact information and customer support channels provided
  5. No explicit privacy policy found on main page, but terms of service present
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and error monitoring tools
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integration of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Sentry for monitoring and analytics. The presence of slick carousel and deferred script loading indicates attention to performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and uses preloading and preconnect hints to improve loading times. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential over-reliance on third-party tracking scripts which may impact privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gigaserver.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gigaserver.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.