Skip to main content

Security report for ghostcash.com

Ghost Cash · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ghost Cash operates as an affiliate marketing platform specializing in adult niche websites, leveraging NATS affiliate tracking software to manage affiliate accounts, site portfolios, and payout programs. The website targets affiliate marketers interested in promoting adult content, offering a basic but functional platform for affiliate registration and login. The technical infrastructure is modest, utilizing jQuery and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with no evident advanced SEO or accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies, exposing the platform to potential risks and compliance issues. The lack of WHOIS registration data further undermines trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site presents moderate business credibility but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and operational maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ghostcash.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on affiliate marketing within the adult content sector, providing affiliates with tracking and payout mechanisms via NATS software. Market positioning is niche-focused with a portfolio of adult sites such as Monger In Asia and Thai Girls Wild. The platform lacks visible contact information, certifications, or privacy policies, limiting its appeal to cautious affiliates. Revenue streams likely derive from commissions on affiliate sales. The absence of WHOIS data and minimal transparency may hinder growth and partnership opportunities. Strategic partnerships appear limited to the promoted adult sites. The platform's growth potential depends on improving trust signals, compliance, and technical robustness.

Security posture

The current security posture is low, with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, increasing vulnerability to interception and attacks. Forms use POST methods but lack visible advanced protections such as CSRF tokens or input sanitization indicators. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data absence raises concerns about domain legitimacy and accountability. Immediate improvements in SSL deployment, security headers, and privacy compliance are critical to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ghost Cash
Description
Affiliate marketing platform powered by NATS affiliate tracking software, offering affiliate accounts, site portfolios, and payout programs.
Key services
Affiliate account registration, Affiliate tracking via NATS software, Access to portfolio of adult niche sites, Affiliate payout programs
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of POST method for login and signup forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. Site uses NATS affiliate tracking software for affiliate marketing.
  5. Content is focused on adult niche affiliate marketing.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or use of subdomain.
  8. Site design and content quality are basic with moderate branding consistency.
  9. No social media or external business contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including jQuery and JavaScript without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The HTML structure is simple but functional, with forms for login and signup using POST methods. No advanced SEO or accessibility features are evident. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimizations detected. The site lacks HTTPS information, which is a critical technical deficiency. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, enhanced SEO metadata, and stronger security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ghostcash.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ghostcash.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.