Skip to main content

Security report for ghorzeeland.nl

GHOR Zeeland · Government · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GHOR Zeeland is a regional governmental organization responsible for coordinating medical emergency response and advising municipalities and healthcare providers in the Zeeland region of the Netherlands. The website clearly communicates its mission, services, and partnerships with other regional safety organizations, positioning itself as a key player in regional crisis management and healthcare coordination. The target audience includes local government entities, emergency services, healthcare professionals, and the general public in Zeeland. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, utilizing modern web technologies and standard libraries such as Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookieFirst for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. The presence of privacy and cookie policies with active consent mechanisms reflects a good level of digital maturity and compliance with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a responsible disclosure page, indicating awareness of security best practices. However, it lacks explicit security policy documentation and data protection officer contact details, which are recommended for enhanced transparency and compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, and the WHOIS data aligns well with the organization's identity, supporting legitimacy. Overall, GHOR Zeeland's website demonstrates a solid balance of professional content, technical soundness, and security awareness appropriate for a public sector emergency coordination entity. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and additional security headers would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ghorzeeland.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GHOR Zeeland operates as an essential government entity focused on emergency medical coordination within the Zeeland region. Its market position is that of a regional coordinator and advisor, collaborating closely with municipalities, healthcare providers, and emergency services. The business model is public service-oriented, funded and mandated by regional authorities. The organization leverages partnerships with Veiligheidsregio Zeeland, Zeeland Veilig, and Brandweer Zeeland to deliver integrated safety and emergency response services. The website content and linked domains reflect a mature partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active recruitment (vacatures) and public engagement through news and social media channels. The organization's operations are stable and focused on regional public safety and healthcare crisis management.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The inclusion of a responsible disclosure page suggests readiness to handle vulnerability reports. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent areas for improvement. No signs of exposed credentials, malware, or phishing were found. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies, but the lack of a published Data Protection Officer contact is a minor compliance gap. Incident response readiness is implied but not explicitly detailed on the site. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and responsibilities.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact details for the Data Protection Officer to improve GDPR compliance transparency.
  4. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GHOR Zeeland
Description
GHOR Zeeland verzorgt de aansturing en coördinatie van de geneeskundige hulpverlening tijdens incidenten (rampen en crises) in de regio Zeeland. Zij zorgt voor samenwerking tussen ambulancediensten, ziekenhuizen, huisartsen en specialisten en adviseert gemeenten en overheidsinstanties.
Key services
Aansturing en coördinatie van geneeskundige hulpverlening, Advies aan gemeenten en overheidsinstanties, Voorbereiding, uitvoering en nazorg bij incidenten
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Featherlight (lightbox), jQuery, js-cookie
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Responsible disclosure page linked

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieFirst consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Dutch language targeting regional stakeholders.
  3. Clear presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No explicit security policy or DPO contact found on site.
  5. Responsible disclosure page is linked, indicating some security maturity.
  6. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and standard web technologies.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter with official accounts.
  8. Contact information includes physical address and phone number with clear context.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and CookieFirst for consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads a variety of JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Featherlight for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate with responsive images and mobile optimization evident. Accessibility features such as contrast toggles and ARIA live regions are implemented, supporting inclusive design. No hosting provider details were explicitly found, but the site uses HTTPS with valid certificates. Technical debt appears low, though adding security headers and optimizing script loading could improve performance and security further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ghorzeeland.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ghorzeeland.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.