Skip to main content

Security report for ghdigitalpartners.com

GH Digital Partners · Technology · United States

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GH Digital Partners operates a website focused on providing a file upload service for clients to submit various file types securely and efficiently. The platform allows users to select their sales representative to expedite order processing, indicating a client-focused service model within the digital or marketing services sector. The website is built on WordPress using Gravity Forms for form handling and file uploads, demonstrating a moderate level of technical infrastructure and digital maturity. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and provides a clear user experience for its intended purpose. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and restricts file upload types and sizes, which are positive security measures. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, lack of privacy and cookie policies, and missing WHOIS registration data raise concerns about the overall security posture and trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness indicators. Overall, while the website functions well for its business purpose, the lack of domain registration data and privacy compliance documentation presents a risk to trust and credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance the site's security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ghdigitalpartners.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
95
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GH Digital Partners appears to serve a niche market segment focused on digital file handling and client order processing. The business model revolves around facilitating file uploads for clients, likely supporting marketing, printing, or digital production workflows. The website's integration of sales representative selection suggests a personalized service approach. The company targets clients requiring secure and efficient file submission, positioning itself as a service provider within the technology sector. The absence of broader business information such as founding year or parent company limits deeper market positioning insights. The current digital presence is functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and trust signals to strengthen competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the file upload form enforces restrictions on file types and maximum file size, reducing risk of malicious uploads. The inclusion of a honeypot field indicates anti-spam measures. However, the lack of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting the organization's transparency and readiness to handle security incidents. The missing WHOIS registration data further undermines trust. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Establish and publicize vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures with dedicated contact channels.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy of the domain ownership.
  5. Enhance trust signals on the website such as certifications, testimonials, or security badges to improve business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GH Digital Partners
Description
GH Digital Partners provides a file upload service allowing users to send multiple files in various formats to expedite orders, with an option to select a sales representative.
Key services
File upload service, Sales representative selection for order processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Plupload
Frameworks
Gravity Forms Orbital Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • File upload restrictions on allowed file types and max size
  • Honeypot field for spam prevention

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is primarily via a detailed file upload form; no direct emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled found.
  4. Site uses WordPress CMS with Gravity Forms plugin for file uploads.
  5. File upload form restricts file types and sizes, indicating some security consideration.
  6. No social media links or external business contact emails found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is a significant trust concern.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled.
  10. Site content is focused on file upload service for GH Digital Partners clients.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Gravity Forms plugin with the Orbital theme for form styling. It leverages jQuery and Plupload libraries for client-side interactivity and file upload functionality. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and optimized font usage. However, the absence of advanced SEO meta tags and structured data limits search engine visibility. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security and SEO enhancements to improve overall digital maturity and resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ghdigitalpartners.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ghdigitalpartners.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.