Skip to main content

Security report for gff.ge

საქართველოს ფეხბურთის ფედერაცია · Government · Georgia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Georgian Football Federation (GFF) operates as the official governing body for football in Georgia, overseeing national teams, leagues, and football development initiatives. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for football-related information, targeting football fans, players, coaches, and officials within Georgia. It maintains strong affiliations with UEFA and FIFA, enhancing its credibility and market position within the sports governance sector. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cloudflare for DNS management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with a well-structured navigation system and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks several security headers and does not publish explicit security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with no visible cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. Contact information is limited to a single official email address. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen the federation's digital maturity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gff.ge

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GFF holds a dominant position as the national football authority in Georgia, managing multiple football leagues, national teams, and grassroots programs. Its business model is non-profit, focused on sports governance and development. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, partnerships, and licensing. The federation targets a broad audience including athletes, coaches, referees, and fans. Partnerships with major sponsors like Bank of Georgia and Coca-Cola, as well as UEFA and FIFA affiliations, reinforce its market presence. The website ecosystem includes related domains for national teams, leagues, and merchandise, indicating a well-integrated digital strategy supporting its operations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is incomplete, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-specific information. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the content. Enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing privacy controls would significantly improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses for better user trust.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update CMS and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
საქართველოს ფეხბურთის ფედერაცია
Description
საქართველოს ფეხბურთის ფედერაცია (Georgian Football Federation) is the governing body of football in Georgia, managing national teams, leagues, and football development programs.
Key services
National football team management, Organization of football leagues and championships, Coach education and licensing, Referee management, Football development and grassroots programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Drupal, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Georgian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  3. Contact information limited to email only; no phone or physical address found.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of modern technologies and CMS (Drupal) with Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. Strong branding and trust signals from UEFA, FIFA, and major sponsors.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, a widely used and mature content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cloudflare for DNS, which are modern and reliable technologies. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes proper meta tags for SEO. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. The technical stack is appropriate for the federation's needs but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gff.ge. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gff.ge.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.