Skip to main content

Security report for gfbio.org

GFBio - Gesellschaft für Biologische Daten e.V. · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GFBio is a German non-profit federation focused on providing a national data infrastructure for biological and environmental research data management. Established in 2013 and funded by the DFG, it offers services including data submission, search, visualization, and training to researchers in biodiversity and ecology. The website reflects a mature organization with a clear mission and strong partnerships, notably with the NFDI4Biodiversity consortium and other research projects. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap 5, Matomo and Google Analytics for tracking, and uses secure HTTPS connections. The infrastructure appears stable and moderately performant with good mobile optimization. However, some security enhancements like DNSSEC and security headers are missing, and there is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protection. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization's profile, enhancing trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Nonetheless, improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response disclosures are recommended. Overall, GFBio presents a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its research audience, with moderate risk and room for security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gfbio.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GFBio operates as a specialized non-profit entity serving the biological and environmental research community in Germany. Its market position is strengthened by DFG funding and partnerships with major biodiversity projects and the NFDI4Biodiversity consortium. The business model centers on providing data infrastructure services, including planning, submission, search, and visualization, supported by training and community engagement. Revenue streams likely derive from grants and institutional support rather than commercial sales. The target customers are academic and research institutions requiring compliant and FAIR data management solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes governmental funding bodies and research consortia, indicating a stable and collaborative operational environment.

Security posture

The website's security posture is solid but not exemplary. HTTPS is properly implemented with anonymized IP tracking in Google Analytics, and domain transfer protection is enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents missed opportunities to harden defenses. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the organization to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear paths for improvement to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GFBio - Gesellschaft für Biologische Daten e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GFBio - Gesellschaft für Biologische Daten e.V.
Description
The German Federation for Biological Data (GFBio) is a sustainable, service-oriented national data infrastructure facilitating data sharing for biological and environmental research. It is a DFG funded network of experts for research data management, committed to high standards in biological and environmental research.
Key services
Data Management Planning, Data Submission, Data Search, Data Visualization and Analysis, Training and Support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, Matomo Analytics, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Material Design Icons, Linea Icons, Pe Icon 7 Stroke, SimpleSAMLphp (SSO)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled with anonymized IP in Google Analytics
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure external libraries with integrity attributes

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant to biological and environmental research data management.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, multiple icon libraries for UI consistency, and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs with integrity checks, enhancing security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The hosting and domain registration are consistent with the organization's profile, though DNSSEC is not enabled. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gfbio.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gfbio.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.