Skip to main content

Security report for geze.at

GEZE GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GEZE GmbH is a globally recognized family-owned company specializing in manufacturing and providing innovative door, window, and safety technology solutions. The company has a strong market position with over 3,000 employees and 37 subsidiaries worldwide, focusing on digital connectivity and building automation. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their products and services, targeting architects, planners, and building operators. Technically, the site uses TYPO3 CMS hosted on AWS CloudFront with modern content delivery but suffers from critical SSL/TLS misconfigurations, impacting security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and consent management via Usercentrics. The site offers multiple contact channels and social media presence, enhancing business credibility. However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS protocols represent significant security risks that should be urgently addressed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geze.at

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention geze.at, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for geze.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GEZE operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on building technology products including automatic doors, window systems, and safety/access control solutions. Their business model combines product sales with digital building automation services and customer support. The company targets professional segments such as architects and building managers, leveraging a global network of subsidiaries and partner sites. The website content and structure support a strong brand image and customer engagement through detailed product finders, service portals, and career opportunities. The presence of multiple localized domains indicates a broad international footprint. The company’s longevity and family-owned status contribute to trust and market stability.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which exposes users to potential interception and undermines trust. While some security headers are implemented, critical features like HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The use of Usercentrics CMP and Google Tag Manager indicates awareness of privacy and tracking controls, but the lack of HTTPS is a major vulnerability. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration is essential to protect user data and maintain compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and correctly install a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS with TLS 1.2 or higher.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce secure connections.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  6. Continue to maintain and improve privacy compliance with transparent data collection and consent mechanisms.
  7. Regularly audit and update security headers and Content Security Policy to mitigate risks.
  8. Enhance performance monitoring to provide accurate load time and resource usage data.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GEZE GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, and is hosted on Amazon AWS CloudFront CDN, ensuring global content delivery. The site uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Usercentrics for consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Despite a professional design and good mobile optimization, performance data is missing, indicating potential monitoring gaps. The invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical technical debt and security risks. The site structure is well-organized with comprehensive navigation and multilingual support. Opportunities exist to modernize SSL/TLS configurations and enhance performance tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geze.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geze.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.