Skip to main content

Security report for gettimely.com

Timely · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Timely is a professional SaaS provider offering salon booking and payment software designed to enhance client experience and streamline salon operations. The website positions Timely as a trusted solution for salons worldwide, emphasizing ease of use, comprehensive features, and client retention. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including React, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, and Osano for consent management, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and privacy mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not publicly disclosed. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism and compliance, suitable for its target market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      SPF DNS Lookup Limit Exceeded

      SPF record requires 12 DNS lookups (max 10)

      What to do: Reduce includes and mechanisms to stay under limit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gettimely.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Timely operates in the salon and beauty industry sector, targeting small to medium-sized salons seeking efficient booking and payment solutions. Its SaaS subscription model provides recurring revenue streams and positions it competitively in the market. The company leverages customer testimonials and industry-specific features to build trust and market presence. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests use of privacy protection services, common in SaaS businesses. Marketing and analytics tools are integrated to optimize customer acquisition and retention. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with payment processors and marketing platforms, though no explicit partner domains were identified.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. Use of third-party security and analytics tools like Microsoft Application Insights and Osano indicates active monitoring and compliance efforts. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score reflects good practices but highlights the need for enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures.
  2. Add a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Verify and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information for security and privacy inquiries.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Timely
Description
A salon booking and payments system that delivers an exceptional client experience and keeps them coming back.
Key services
Online bookings, In-salon payments, Client management, Staff management, Reporting & analytics, Stock & inventory, Marketing tools, Client loyalty
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by data-react-mount attributes), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, Osano Consent Management, Marketo Munchkin, Swiper.js
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (Application Insights)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Marketo Munchkin
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, Marketo Munchkin
Marketing tools
Marketo, Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive elements.
  2. Strong focus on salon industry with tailored solutions.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable publicly, possibly due to privacy protection.
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack with React and Umbraco CMS, supported by robust analytics and consent management tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses video and interactive demos to engage users effectively. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing security audits. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation to further strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gettimely.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gettimely.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.