Skip to main content

Security report for getswan.com

Swan AI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Swan AI operates as a technology company specializing in AI-driven lead generation and visitor identification services. Their platform focuses on converting anonymous website visitors into qualified meetings through automated LinkedIn outreach, targeting B2B companies. The website is built using modern tools like Framer and employs standard web technologies, presenting a professional and consistent brand image. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no detected security headers or DNSSEC enabled, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business's credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of getswan.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getswan.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention getswan.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for getswan.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Swan AI positions itself in the competitive AI SaaS market for B2B lead generation, leveraging AI to identify and qualify anonymous visitors and automate outreach. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting companies seeking to enhance sales pipelines via AI and LinkedIn integration. The company has a stable domain age consistent with its founding year, indicating operational maturity. The website content is focused and relevant, though lacking in detailed corporate disclosures and compliance documentation. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced security. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve domain security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance security posture.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to protect against DNS spoofing.
  4. Add clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Swan AI
Description
Swan flips the game with AI agents that ID anonymous visitors, qualify them against your ICP, and drive laser-targeted LinkedIn outreach
Key services
AI identification of anonymous website visitors, Qualification against Ideal Customer Profile (ICP), Automated LinkedIn outreach
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), Google Fonts, Open Graph meta tags, Twitter Cards
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage.
  3. No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
  4. Website uses modern web fonts and is built with Framer, indicating a modern design approach.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and shows no privacy protection or suspicious registration patterns.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, using modern web fonts and meta tags for SEO and social media integration. The site appears mobile optimized with good design quality and user experience. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance metrics available. The lack of detected analytics or advertising scripts suggests minimal tracking, which is positive for privacy. However, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and has standard registrar protections but no advanced DNS security features. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getswan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getswan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.