Skip to main content

Security report for getrecharge.com

Recharge · E-commerce · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Recharge is a leading subscription management platform specializing in powering ecommerce businesses with recurring payment solutions. Serving over 20,000 brands and managing more than 100 million subscribers, Recharge offers a comprehensive suite of tools including subscription management, revenue optimization, customer intelligence, and retention services. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for brands seeking to build lasting buyer routines and grow subscription revenue. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, and various analytics and marketing integrations. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, client-side URL sanitization, and cookie consent managed via OneTrust, though explicit security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business profile. Overall, Recharge demonstrates a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious online presence aligned with its enterprise-scale business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getrecharge.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Recharge operates in the ecommerce subscription sector, targeting merchants who want to implement or optimize subscription and recurring payment models. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive customer base, robust analytics, and retention tools that help merchants increase lifetime value. The business model is SaaS-based, offering no-code solutions alongside APIs for customization. Recharge maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with agency and technology partners, enhancing its market reach and integration capabilities. Growth indicators include a large volume of processed transactions and a high number of subscribers. The company emphasizes trust and security through dedicated trust and vulnerability reporting pages, supporting its enterprise clientele. Strategic observations highlight Recharge's focus on innovation, customer success, and comprehensive support services.

Security posture

Recharge exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, client-side sanitization of URL parameters to prevent injection attacks, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The presence of a dedicated trust center and vulnerability reporting page indicates proactive security governance. However, explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options were not explicitly found in the HTML source, suggesting room for enhancement. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response contact channels are available, supporting timely handling of security issues. Overall, the security maturity is high but can be improved by formalizing header policies and continuous third-party risk management.

Recommendations

  1. Explicitly implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  3. Enhance server-side input validation to complement client-side sanitization.
  4. Maintain up-to-date CMS and plugin versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  5. Promote transparency by publishing data retention policies and security certifications.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Recharge
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Recharge
Description
The subscription management platform that powers the growth and retention strategies of more than 20,000 brands.
Key services
Subscription management, Revenue tools, Customer intelligence, Retention and growth tools, Developer API and integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, HubSpot Forms, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Dreamdata Analytics, Hotjar, PartnerStack, GSAP, jQuery
Platforms
Shopify, BigCommerce, Headless ecommerce
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Sanitization of URL parameters via client-side script
  • Cookie consent management via OneTrust
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Dreamdata, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Dreamdata
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Hotjar, Mutiny
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on subscription management for ecommerce businesses.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple contact forms for sales and newsletter signups.
  5. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  7. Security practices are good but could improve header implementations.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent business identity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern and robust technical infrastructure centered on WordPress CMS enhanced with Yoast SEO for optimization. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and Dreamdata, enabling extensive data collection and user behavior insights. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with lazy loading and prefetching techniques employed. Accessibility features are present, including skip links and ARIA labels. The use of HubSpot forms indicates a focus on lead generation and customer engagement. Technical risks include reliance on numerous third-party scripts which require continuous monitoring. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and scalable business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getrecharge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getrecharge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.