Skip to main content

Security report for getmoss.com

Moss · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Moss is a technology company offering a SaaS platform focused on corporate spend management, including unlimited corporate credit cards, expense management, and accounts payable automation. The website positions Moss as a modern financial technology provider targeting businesses seeking to optimize their spending processes. The platform aims to accelerate month-end financial closing and streamline corporate expenses. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, with integrations for analytics and consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and consent management tools but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the professional website and use of reputable third-party services suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getmoss.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Moss operates in the financial technology sector, providing corporate spend management solutions. Its business model revolves around SaaS offerings that simplify expense management and corporate credit card usage. The company targets medium-sized businesses and enterprises looking to improve financial operations. The website content and technology stack indicate a focus on digital maturity and customer experience. However, the lack of public WHOIS data and absence of contact information on the website limit transparency. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and consent management providers, suggesting an ecosystem approach. Growth indicators are not explicitly visible, but the use of advanced marketing and testing tools implies active customer acquisition efforts.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform (Usercentrics), which supports GDPR compliance efforts. It uses Visual Website Optimizer and Google Analytics for tracking, with mechanisms to respect user consent. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided content, and no visible privacy or cookie policies were found, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and security posture. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing comprehensive security headers, explicit privacy and cookie policies, and transparent contact information for incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure all forms and data collection points have CSRF protection and secure input validation.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to confirm domain legitimacy and improve trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization, including removing or adjusting the 'noindex' robots meta tag.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Moss
Description
Moss offers unlimited corporate credit cards, easy expense management, end-to-end accounts payable, and faster month-end.
Key services
Unlimited corporate credit cards, Expense management, Accounts payable automation, Month-end closing acceleration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (implied by JSX classes), Next.js (implied by _next static paths), Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Analytics (gtag.js), Usercentrics (consent management), Web Workers, Service Workers
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied (canonical URLs use https)
  • Use of consent management platform (Usercentrics)
  • Use of VWO for A/B testing with consent considerations

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Heavy use of third-party analytics and A/B testing tools with consent management.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  7. SEO meta tags present but robots meta tag is set to 'noindex', which may limit search engine indexing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and static asset optimization. It uses advanced analytics and A/B testing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Visual Website Optimizer, integrated with a consent management platform (Usercentrics). The site preloads fonts and images for performance and uses web workers for background processing. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive images and viewport settings. However, SEO is limited by the 'noindex' robots meta tag. The site lacks visible CMS identification and hosting provider details. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The technical infrastructure supports a scalable and maintainable web presence but requires enhancements in security and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getmoss.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getmoss.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.