Skip to main content

Security report for getlouder.pl

Get Louder Sp. z o.o. · Other · Poland

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Get Louder Sp. z o.o. is a Polish event marketing agency specializing in creating memorable event experiences that blend offline and online brand engagement. As part of the Group One family, it serves a professional clientele with creative event production and brand relationship building. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies and includes privacy and cookie policies demonstrating GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone, and physical address. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics with consent denied by default, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getlouder.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a creative and experienced event agency targeting brands and companies seeking event marketing solutions. Its affiliation with Group One enhances market credibility. The business model focuses on event production, creative concept development, and integrated brand engagement. The website content and structure support a small-sized agency with a clear focus on quality and client relationships. The presence of a Data Protection Officer and privacy policies indicates regulatory awareness. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are present, consistent with a service-based agency model. The company leverages Google Tag Manager and Iubenda for marketing and compliance, indicating a moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management, which are positive security practices. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML source, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Iubenda is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is a gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency website but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy on the website to inform users and clients about security practices.
  2. Add an incident response or abuse contact email to facilitate reporting of security issues.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Get Louder Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Get Louder Sp. z o.o.
Description
Agencja eventowa tworzona przez ludzi z dużym doświadczeniem, należąca do rodziny spółek Group One. Tworzy piękne chwile, niezapomniane doznania i doświadczenia pełne pozytywnych emocji, łącząc świat offline z online i budując relacje marki z konsumentem.
Key services
Event production, Conceptual and creative work, Brand engagement, Offline and online event integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda cookie solution
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Iubenda
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Iubenda cookie solution
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Polish language targeting event marketing clients.
  3. Clear contact information including emails, phone, and physical address provided.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked as PDFs.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy found.
  6. Data Protection Officer contact is provided, supporting GDPR compliance.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with modern versions and standard libraries.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking with consent denied by default.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Tag Manager and Iubenda for analytics and cookie management. The site uses responsive design techniques and custom CSS for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and RSS feeds. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small event agency website. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement advanced security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getlouder.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getlouder.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.