Skip to main content

Security report for getbeamer.com

Beamer · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beamer is a SaaS company specializing in customer communication platforms designed to enhance product releases, user engagement, and feedback collection. Their platform offers a modern changelog, NPS surveys, feedback management, push and in-app notifications, and user onboarding tools. Positioned as a key player in the SaaS engagement space, Beamer targets product and marketing teams seeking to improve customer communication and product adoption. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content focused on their product suite and resources. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Hotjar, and HubSpot, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, GDPR compliance, and a public bug bounty program. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain transparency and trust. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, which slightly impacts business credibility. Overall, Beamer demonstrates a solid technical and security foundation with a professional business model, but domain registration opacity and limited direct contact information suggest areas for improvement.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of getbeamer.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getbeamer.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
95
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Beamer operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS tools for product communication and user engagement. Their business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting product and marketing teams in digital businesses. The company leverages partnerships, notably with Userflow for onboarding solutions, enhancing their product ecosystem. Their marketing strategy includes extensive use of analytics and retargeting tools, supported by clear privacy and security policies. Growth indicators include a comprehensive resource center, developer docs, and a trust center, signaling a mature product offering. The lack of public company registration details and domain WHOIS transparency is a notable gap. The company maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and trust signals such as GDPR compliance and a bug bounty program.

Security posture

Beamer exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, robust security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, and GDPR compliance. The presence of a bug bounty program indicates proactive vulnerability management. However, the absence of a published security.txt file and explicit security contact emails limits incident response transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with cookie consent mechanisms, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is high but could be enhanced by formalizing vulnerability disclosure channels and improving contact transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response transparency.
  2. Provide explicit security contact emails (e.g., security@ or abuse@) on the website to facilitate reporting.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to improve domain trustworthiness.
  4. Add verified company contact emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beamer
Description
Beamer helps product and marketing teams increase user engagement, drive product adoption, and close the feedback loop.
Key services
Changelog, NPS surveys, User feedback, Push notifications, In-app notifications, User onboarding
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot, Beamer embed scripts
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • Bug bounty program
  • GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Heap Analytics, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on SaaS product communication and user engagement
  3. Multiple privacy and security policies published
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found publicly
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency
  6. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with cookie consent mechanisms
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Heap, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates fast loading times, excellent mobile responsiveness, and good accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears to be managed by Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a professional user experience. Opportunities exist to further enhance security by adding a security.txt file and improving domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100 +4Low18 findingsView report
  2. 78/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getbeamer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getbeamer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.