Skip to main content

Security report for getapro.lv

SIA City24 · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GetaPro is a Latvian online service platform operated by SIA City24 that connects users with verified specialists for a wide range of household and professional services. The platform enables users to create orders, receive offers from service providers, select the best specialist based on price and reviews, and provide feedback after task completion. The website is well-established with over 20,000 active specialists and hundreds of thousands of orders, positioning it as a significant player in the Latvian service marketplace. The business targets Latvian residents seeking reliable service providers across multiple categories.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getapro.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates an online marketplace business model, generating value by facilitating connections between service requesters and providers. It leverages a multi-category approach covering construction, repairs, cleaning, IT, education, and more, appealing to a broad customer base. The presence of mobile applications for Android and iOS enhances accessibility and user engagement. The platform benefits from strong brand consistency, social media presence, and media coverage, which support its market position. Partnerships with sister sites and related domains under the City24 group indicate a broader ecosystem supporting its operations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure login mechanisms including OAuth with Facebook, Google, and Apple. It integrates modern analytics and advertising technologies with user consent management, reflecting a mature approach to privacy and tracking. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly present, and no public security policy or incident response contacts are found. There is no vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are recommended for transparency and security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
SIA City24
Registration number
40003692375
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA City24
Description
GetaPro is an online service platform that allows users to create orders and find verified specialists for various household and professional service types. Users can post tasks, receive offers from interested contractors, select the best specialist based on recommendations or price, and rate the service after completion.
Key services
Order creation, Service provider offers, Specialist selection, User reviews and ratings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Application Insights, AdOcean advertising scripts, Apple Sign In JS SDK
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login forms with CSRF tokens
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts with consent
  • Use of OAuth external login providers (Facebook, Google, Apple)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdOcean, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Microsoft Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant.
  4. Multiple social media and external links to reputable domains.
  5. Use of modern analytics and advertising technologies with consent mechanisms.
  6. Secure login and registration forms with external OAuth providers.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. Business information is clear and consistent with the website content.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Application Insights, and AdOcean advertising scripts. Hosting assets are served via Azure CDN, supporting good performance and scalability. The site appears to be built on ASP.NET MVC framework, inferred from URL patterns and form actions. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and dedicated mobile app offerings. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for modernization in security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getapro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getapro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.