Skip to main content

Security report for getafecf.com

Getafe CF · Other · Spain

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Getafe CF operates an official website serving as the primary digital platform for the Spanish football club. The site provides comprehensive information including news, match results, ticket sales, merchandise, and club history, targeting fans and supporters. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity, utilizing modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, with integration of third-party services for analytics and cookie consent management. The hosting infrastructure appears to leverage Microsoft Azure Blob Storage for static assets, ensuring reliable content delivery. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are not clearly published. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain registration status, but the presence of official branding and social media links supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with GDPR requirements, though improvements in security transparency and domain registration verification are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getafecf.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Getafe CF's website positions the club as a well-established sports entity in Spain, focusing on fan engagement through news, ticketing, and merchandise sales. The business model centers on direct interaction with supporters and commercial activities related to the club's brand. Partnerships with ticketing platforms and the club's foundation indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The site targets a medium-sized audience primarily in Spain, with content in Spanish and some English alternatives. The digital presence supports the club's market position as a recognized football team, leveraging social media and digital marketing tools to enhance reach. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of CSR initiatives. The absence of detailed company registration data online suggests a need for improved transparency in business credentials.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits the site's preparedness for security incidents. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance measures and maintain up-to-date cookie consent mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Getafe CF
Description
Sigue toda la actualidad del Getafe CF en nuestra web. Las últimas noticias, partidos, entradas y camisetas del Getafe. Entra ahora y conoce la información
Key services
News updates, Match results and statistics, Ticket sales, Merchandise store, Club information and history
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, AMP iframe, Splide.js slider
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Google and Facebook domain verification present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Metricool
Marketing tools
Metricool
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Spanish.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable or domain not registered under queried name.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. Multiple official social media links present.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily Next.js and React, providing server-side rendering and good performance. It integrates jQuery for specific UI components like the media player. Hosting assets on Azure Blob Storage suggests a scalable and reliable infrastructure. The site includes Google Tag Manager and Metricool for analytics and marketing tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by addressing security header gaps and ensuring domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getafecf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getafecf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.