Skip to main content

Security report for get.onl

Dot Online GmbH · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dot Online GmbH operates the website get.onl, providing domain registration services specifically for the .ONL top-level domain, along with complementary services such as website building, hosting, email hosting, and web security products. The company positions itself as a global and affordable provider targeting individuals and businesses seeking to establish an online presence with a memorable .ONL domain. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, mobile optimization, and consistent branding, supporting a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching get.onl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on domain registration and web hosting services, leveraging partnerships with multiple well-known domain registrars to broaden market reach. The company targets a diverse audience including startups, businesses, and individuals looking for domain names and online services. The presence of promotional offers and a community showcase indicates active marketing and customer engagement strategies. The company operates primarily in the technology sector with a medium-sized footprint based in Germany.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes CSRF protection scripts and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a baseline security posture. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or a published security policy or incident response contact, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good practices but room for enhancement in transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding explicit data retention policies and more detailed privacy compliance information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dot Online GmbH
Description
.ONL is a global, affordable online presence that lets you to stand out from others. Join our community! Get a .ONL web and email address here.
Key services
Domain registration (.ONL domains), Website builder, Web hosting (single, multi-domain, reseller, VPS, dedicated servers), Email hosting (business and enterprise email), Web security (SiteLock, CodeGuard, SSL certificates)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, Cookie Consent JS, CSRF Protector
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection script included
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailChimp (newsletter signup)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers domain registration and hosting services focused on .ONL TLD
  2. Clear cookie consent and privacy policy present
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage; contact via support page
  4. Use of multiple external trusted partners and registrars
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  7. Good use of modern web technologies and fonts
  8. Some scripts loaded from third-party CDNs
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but somewhat dated technology stack including jQuery and Bootstrap 3, with fonts served via Typekit and analytics via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is custom-built without a common CMS, which may reduce some common CMS vulnerabilities but requires dedicated maintenance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site includes CSRF protection and cookie consent scripts, indicating attention to security and privacy. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with get.onl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review get.onl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.