Skip to main content

Security report for gesundheitliche-chancengleichheit.de

Kooperationsverbund Gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Kooperationsverbund Gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit is a German government-supported cooperative network focused on promoting health equity and prevention among socially disadvantaged groups. Founded in 2003 and supported by the Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG), it provides resources, events, and coordination for integrated municipal health strategies. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend technologies and offers comprehensive content in German. Security posture is good with HTTPS and obfuscated emails, but lacks visible cookie consent and explicit security policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving public health professionals and stakeholders in Germany.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gesundheitliche-chancengleichheit.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a government-backed health promotion network with 76 partner organizations. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on knowledge sharing, event organization, and resource provision. The target audience includes public health professionals and municipal coordinators. The site links extensively to partner and government domains, reinforcing its credibility. Growth is indicated by active event listings and updated publications. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving multiple health and social organizations across Germany.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, obfuscated email addresses to prevent scraping, and disabled cookies in Matomo analytics to enhance privacy. However, it lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism and does not publish a security or incident response policy, which are gaps in GDPR and best practice compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear cookie consent banner to comply with EU regulations and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to enhance user trust and compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kooperationsverbund Gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit
Description
Kooperationsverbund Gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit is a cooperative network initiated by the Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), now Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG), focused on promoting health equity and prevention in Germany. It supports integrated municipal strategies, health promotion for socially disadvantaged groups, and provides materials, events, and good practice examples.
Key services
Health promotion coordination, Provision of materials and publications, Event organization and documentation, Good practice database, Support for integrated municipal health strategies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Photoswipe, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Email addresses obfuscated with JavaScript encryption
  • No cookies set by Matomo (disabled cookies)
  • Use of modern JS libraries asynchronously loaded

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. Powered by TYPO3 CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  3. Strong focus on health equity, prevention, and public health in Germany.
  4. No visible cookie consent banner despite use of tracking (Matomo).
  5. Contact information is present but email addresses are obfuscated.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, combined with Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs Photoswipe for image galleries and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated security headers and cookie management improvements. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain uses German name servers consistent with the organization's location.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gesundheitliche-chancengleichheit.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gesundheitliche-chancengleichheit.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.