Skip to main content

Security report for gerulata.com

Gerulata Technologies j. s. a. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gerulata Technologies is a specialized technology company focused on providing advanced AI-powered tools and professional services to combat information warfare and disinformation. Their offerings, including the Gerulata Juno platform, target government institutions, regulators, law enforcement, military, intelligence agencies, research institutions, and journalism professionals. The company positions itself as a niche provider in the information security and analysis sector with a strong emphasis on digital safety and strategic communications. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Axios, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Matomo analytics, and CookieYes for consent management. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and incorporates privacy-respecting analytics. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good SEO and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, as it reduces trust in domain legitimacy despite the professional website presence. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and privacy-conscious but would benefit from improved transparency regarding domain registration, explicit security policies, and direct contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gerulata.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gerulata Technologies operates in a specialized market niche addressing the growing need for tools to counter disinformation and hostile information activities. Their business model combines SaaS platforms with professional services, targeting public sector and security-focused organizations. The company demonstrates a clear understanding of its target audience and use cases, including strategic communications and institutional digital safety. The presence of job postings and case studies indicates active growth and engagement. The lack of public contact emails and phone numbers suggests a controlled communication approach, likely to maintain security and privacy. The company leverages privacy-focused analytics and consent management, aligning with regulatory requirements and customer expectations in sensitive sectors.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse, and a robust cookie consent framework supporting GDPR compliance. The use of Matomo analytics reflects a preference for privacy-conscious tools. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be addressed to harden the site further. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant trust concern and should be investigated or remediated to avoid suspicion.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to facilitate legitimate communication and improve business credibility.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to ensure domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gerulata Technologies j. s. a.
Description
Gerulata Technologies provides advanced tech tools for analysts and security professionals to combat disinformation and information warfare.
Key services
Gerulata Juno (AI-powered monitoring and analysis platform), Gerulata Sentinel, Data Products, Professional Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Slick Carousel 1.9.0, Axios 1.6.7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Matomo Analytics, CookieYes Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on information warfare and disinformation countermeasures
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  5. Contact only via detailed contact form requiring multiple fields
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  7. Use of privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo) instead of Google Analytics
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of well-known JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Axios, indicating a modern but not cutting-edge tech stack. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 and Matomo analytics shows a balanced approach to security and privacy. CookieYes is used for consent management, reflecting compliance with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and no advanced frameworks like React or Angular are detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and adding security headers. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for enhancement to meet higher standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gerulata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gerulata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.