Skip to main content

Security report for gerichte.li

Fürstliche Gerichte · Government · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gerichte.li serves as the official online presence of the Fürstliches Landgericht (Princely Court) in Vaduz, Liechtenstein. It provides comprehensive information about the judicial system, including details on various courts, personnel, services, and public court hearings. The site targets the general public, legal professionals, and parties involved in legal proceedings within Liechtenstein. As an official government portal, it holds a strong market position as the authoritative source for judicial information in the country. Technically, the website is built on the Concrete5 CMS platform and leverages modern frontend technologies such as jQuery, Font Awesome, and the Foundation framework. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and moderate performance. However, some accessibility features could be improved. SEO is basic but functional, with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and does not provide a cookie consent mechanism, which are areas for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the official nature of the site, confirming its legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its purpose effectively. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and accessibility would enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gerichte.li

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Fürstliche Gerichte website represents a government judicial entity in Liechtenstein, providing essential legal and court-related services. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on public service and transparency. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its official status and comprehensive judicial information. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a government service. The target audience includes citizens, legal professionals, and parties to legal proceedings. The site shows indicators of stability and official backing, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The content and navigation are designed to support public access to judicial information, reflecting a clear and consistent branding aligned with government standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy practices. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were found, but improvements in security best practices and compliance would strengthen the overall posture. The site’s security culture appears basic, typical for government websites but with room for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve usability for all users.
  5. Develop and publish a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fürstliche Gerichte
Description
Official website of the Fürstliches Landgericht (Princely Court) in Vaduz, Liechtenstein, providing information about courts, organization, personnel, services, and public court hearings.
Key services
Information about courts (Landgericht, Obergericht, Oberster Gerichtshof), Organization and personnel details, Service information including fees, online services, legal advice, Publication of court hearings and schedules
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, jQuery Magnific Popup, Tablesorter, Foundation Framework, Concrete5 CMS
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official government judicial portal for Liechtenstein.
  2. Content is primarily in German (de).
  3. No privacy or cookie banners detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  5. No social media links except a Twitter handle in meta tags (@LBA_Banking).
  6. Multiple phone numbers and physical address clearly provided.
  7. No email addresses explicitly listed in the visible content.
  8. Uses Concrete5 CMS with modern frontend libraries.
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Concrete5 CMS combined with jQuery, Font Awesome, and Foundation framework, indicating a modern but not cutting-edge tech stack. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The use of multiple JavaScript libraries and CSS frameworks suggests some technical debt but overall stable infrastructure. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN usage from the provided data. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD. The site could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gerichte.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gerichte.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.