Skip to main content

Security report for geotiles.com

Geotiles Cerámica · Manufacturing · Spain

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geotiles Cerámica is a Spanish company specializing in ceramic tiles and pavements, targeting architects, builders, retailers, and consumers. The website presents a professional and multilingual digital presence, leveraging WordPress with the Divi theme and various modern plugins to deliver a visually appealing and functional user experience. The company offers a range of ceramic tile collections, technical solutions, and catalogs, supported by clear contact information and social media engagement. Technically, the website uses a mature CMS platform with modern front-end libraries and plugins, ensuring good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The site enforces HTTPS and provides a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good baseline practices such as HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security policies or incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trustworthiness. Overall, the website is well-constructed and compliant with privacy regulations, but the missing WHOIS information and lack of explicit security policies suggest areas for improvement to enhance business credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geotiles.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geotiles Cerámica operates in the manufacturing and retail sector of ceramic tiles, serving a medium-sized market primarily in Spain with multilingual outreach. The business model focuses on product collections and technical solutions for construction and design professionals. The company maintains active social media channels on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, indicating engagement with customers and industry partners. The website's structured content and professional design reflect a stable market position with potential for growth. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and should be investigated to confirm domain ownership and legitimacy.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism in place. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The site does not expose sensitive information or use vulnerable libraries visibly. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Regular security audits and implementation of security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are recommended to strengthen defenses. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not directly indicate a security vulnerability.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to confirm domain registration legitimacy and improve business credibility.
  4. Conduct regular vulnerability assessments of all third-party plugins and update them promptly to mitigate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform audits to improve compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Geotiles Cerámica
Description
Azulejos y pavimentos cerámicos
Key services
Ceramic tile collections, Technical solutions, Catalogs, Customer contact and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Google Fonts, Swiper.js, WPML (multilingual plugin), Complianz GDPR plugin, Meow Lightbox, Ultimate Carousel for Divi
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Spanish and multilingual support
  2. Professional design using Divi theme and modern plugins
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management
  4. Contact information including phone and physical address clearly provided
  5. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  7. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent
  8. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, enhanced with plugins such as Slider Revolution, WPML for multilingual support, Complianz for GDPR cookie management, Meow Lightbox, and Ultimate Carousel. The front-end uses jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification evident. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers are missing, and accessibility could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geotiles.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geotiles.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.