Skip to main content

Security report for geoprostor.net

Geoprostor · Government · Slovenia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website geoprostor.net hosts the PISO portal, a spatial information system designed for Slovenian municipalities. It provides public, internal, and professional GIS services to local government entities, facilitating access to spatial data and related services. The platform is positioned as a key government service for spatial data management in Slovenia, targeting municipal users and public sector stakeholders. The business model is focused on providing digital spatial data infrastructure and support services to municipalities, with offerings including public data access, internal tools, professional services, web services, seminars, and user support. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET WebForms with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap 5, and Font Awesome. It uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization for visitor tracking and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile responsive and has a professional design with clear navigation. However, it lacks some modern security headers and explicit contact or security policy pages. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent, but does not expose detailed security policies or incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in security headers and transparency. The overall risk is moderate; the site appears legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced security practices and clearer business contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geoprostor.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geoprostor operates in the government sector, providing spatial information systems to Slovenian municipalities. Its competitive advantage lies in being a centralized platform for spatial data services tailored to local government needs. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on public sector clients with offerings that include public data portals, internal GIS tools, and professional services (PISO PRO). Revenue streams likely come from government contracts or municipal subscriptions. The target customers are municipal administrations and public sector GIS users. The presence of seminars and support indicates a focus on user engagement and training. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of Google services and ASP.NET suggests integration with common technology providers. Growth indicators are not visible, but the extensive list of municipalities served suggests broad adoption within Slovenia.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented with GDPR compliance indicators such as IP anonymization in Google Analytics. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. The large number of hidden __VIEWSTATE fields typical of ASP.NET WebForms could increase attack surface if not properly protected. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS registrant data reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with recommendations to enhance header security and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Review and optimize __VIEWSTATE usage to reduce potential attack surface and improve performance.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Provide clear business contact information and verify domain registration details to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Geoprostor
Description
Prostorski informacijski sistem občin (Spatial Information System of Municipalities) providing geographic and spatial data services to municipalities in Slovenia.
Key services
Public spatial data access, Internal spatial data services, PISO PRO advanced services, Web services (OGC), Seminars and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery 3.5.1, jQuery UI 1.13.1, Bootstrap 5.3.1, Font Awesome, Google Analytics
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Slovenian municipal spatial information system portal.
  2. Content is in Slovenian language with localized date/time and currency formats.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page labeled, but cookie policy page exists and covers privacy aspects.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website uses ASP.NET WebForms technology with heavy use of __VIEWSTATE fields.
  9. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization enabled.
  10. No social media links or company contact details found in the visible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature but older technology stack using ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, and Bootstrap 5. It leverages Google Analytics with privacy-conscious settings. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO. However, the heavy reliance on large __VIEWSTATE fields may impact performance and security. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or in-house developed platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site lacks some modern security headers and accessibility features. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geoprostor.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geoprostor.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.