Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie · Government · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.
The Geodatenzentrum of the Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie is an official German government portal providing a wide range of geospatial data, maps, software, and web services. It serves as the central distribution point for official geodata in Germany, targeting government agencies, professionals, and the public. The platform operates on Magento, offering both free and paid geodata products under the AdV fee guidelines. The website content is well-structured and professionally presented, primarily in German, with clear navigation and relevant business information. Technically, the site uses a mix of legacy and modern web technologies including Magento, Prototype.js, jQuery, and OpenLayers for mapping functionalities. However, the site suffers from significant security shortcomings, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which critically impacts user trust and security posture. Performance is suboptimal, and mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Security-wise, while some HTTP security headers are set, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols, along with malformed DNS CAA records and missing DNSSEC, represent critical vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, limiting transparency. Contact information is clearly provided, including official phone numbers and an email address, along with links to official social media channels. Overall, the website is a credible government resource with good content and business credibility but requires urgent improvements in security infrastructure and privacy compliance to meet modern standards and user expectations.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention geodatenzentrum.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for geodatenzentrum.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with geodatenzentrum.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geodatenzentrum.de.