Skip to main content

Security report for genti.lv

Other

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.genti.lv is a small-scale business site built on the Wix platform, primarily targeting a Latvian audience as indicated by the language and domain. The site uses standard Wix hosting and includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for traffic and user behavior tracking. However, the site lacks detailed business information, contact details, and legal policies such as privacy or cookie policies, which limits its transparency and trustworthiness. Technically, the site is moderately optimized with basic mobile responsiveness and standard performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no additional security headers or policies detected, indicating room for improvement in protecting user data and site integrity. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment, but the use of Wix and lack of business identity details suggest a small or new business presence. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business credibility to improve trust and professional standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching genti.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind www.genti.lv appears to be a small entity without publicly disclosed company details or registration information. The site does not provide explicit descriptions of services or products, nor does it list contact information or certifications. The use of Wix suggests a cost-effective approach to web presence, likely targeting local or niche markets in Latvia. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of contact channels, may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model and market positioning remain unclear due to minimal content and lack of structured data. The site’s reliance on Google Analytics indicates an interest in monitoring visitor behavior, possibly for marketing or improvement purposes.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no security policies or certifications are visible. The presence of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Wix scripts introduces potential risk vectors if not properly managed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also raises compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing security best practices, enhancing transparency, and establishing incident response mechanisms to improve resilience and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish clear contact information and business credentials to improve credibility and customer confidence.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, core-js, focus-within-polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and Google Analytics tracking.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded error.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. No security policy or incident response information detected.
  6. No certifications or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. Website content is minimal and lacks detailed business information.
  8. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture is basic.
  9. No WAF or security challenge detected; site is accessible.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging its hosting and content management capabilities. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads standard Wix scripts and polyfills for browser compatibility. Performance is moderate with some optimizations but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic, with some responsive design elements but no explicit accessibility enhancements detected. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML source. However, the absence of security headers and limited meta information indicates technical debt and opportunities for modernization. The site would benefit from improved SEO metadata, accessibility compliance, and security hardening to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with genti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review genti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.