Skip to main content

Security report for gensokyo.tf

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gensokyo.tf is a personal blog and link collection site maintained by an individual named Celestine, who identifies as a network and phone system enthusiast. The site serves as a portfolio and a hub for sharing blog articles and links to other interesting users and pages within niche communities. The domain has been registered since 2014 with OVH, indicating a stable and long-term presence. The website's market position is niche and personal, targeting general audiences interested in the author's content and network-related topics. From a technical perspective, the site uses basic HTML5 and CSS with vanilla JavaScript, hosted on OVH infrastructure. The performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal, and no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site lacks modern security headers and does not display evidence of HTTPS enforcement in the provided data, which limits its security posture. Security-wise, the website does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor does it offer contact information or incident response channels. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing the attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The absence of security headers and HTTPS (not confirmed but no evidence of SSL) lowers the security score. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected, and the domain registration data supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is low risk but could benefit from improved security practices, privacy compliance, and enhanced technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gensokyo.tf

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal portfolio and blog, targeting a niche audience interested in network and phone systems. It does not appear to generate revenue or operate as a commercial business. The domain age and hosting provider (OVH) suggest a stable and self-managed infrastructure. The external links indicate a community-oriented approach, connecting to other personal or niche sites. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The business model is personal content sharing without monetization or commercial services. Growth indicators and market positioning are limited due to the site's personal nature.

Security posture

The security posture of gensokyo.tf is basic. The site lacks HTTPS confirmation in the provided data, no security headers are detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are published. There are no forms or data collection points, which reduces risk but also limits functionality. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, reducing suspicion. Overall, the site is low risk but does not follow best practices for security and privacy compliance, which could be improved to enhance trustworthiness and user safety.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels for transparency and user trust.
  5. Improve SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of Celestine (aka isithran), a network and phone system enthusiast sharing blog articles and links.
Key services
blog articles, links to interesting users and pages
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, Vanilla JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog and link hub for a network/phone system enthusiast named Celestine.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  5. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses basic HTML and CSS with some external linked images and vanilla JS.
  7. External links mostly point to personal or niche community sites.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  9. No adult or explicit content present.
  10. Domain registration data is consistent and indicates a legitimate personal site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML5, CSS, and vanilla JavaScript without any detected CMS or frameworks. It is hosted by OVH, a reputable hosting provider. The site has basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO optimization and performance tuning. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating minimal tracking and marketing. The absence of security headers and unclear SSL status are technical risks. The site is straightforward but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements to improve resilience and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gensokyo.tf. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gensokyo.tf.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.