Skip to main content

Security report for gemeinsam-gegen-sexismus.de

Bündnis "Gemeinsam gegen Sexismus" · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Bündnis Gemeinsam gegen Sexismus' represents a government-supported non-profit alliance focused on combating sexism and sexual harassment across various sectors in Germany. It is funded by the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (BMBFSFJ) and managed by EAF Berlin. The site provides educational resources, alliance membership opportunities, and promotes effective measures against sexism. The presence of testimonials from prominent figures and organizations enhances its credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Borlabs Cookie for cookie management and consent. It employs Plausible Analytics for privacy-friendly user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well. Hosting is via rzone.de name servers, consistent with the domain registration. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not clearly present and should be added to enhance security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response and security policy pages are not found, which could be improved. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. The domain WHOIS data aligns with the website's purpose and legitimacy, showing no suspicious patterns. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and adding explicit incident response contacts to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gemeinsam-gegen-sexismus.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gemeinsam-gegen-sexismus.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The alliance operates as a medium-sized non-profit entity within the government and social sectors, targeting organizations and individuals committed to fighting sexism in Germany. Its business model revolves around coalition-building, awareness campaigns, and resource provision, supported by federal funding. The alliance leverages partnerships with government bodies and reputable organizations to amplify its impact. The website's content and testimonials indicate a strong market position as a trusted social initiative. Growth potential lies in expanding membership and influence across sectors. The alliance maintains a professional digital presence with consistent branding and clear messaging.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. The absence of explicit security headers like CSP and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap that should be addressed. No signs of exposed credentials, vulnerable libraries, or security incidents were found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. Overall, the site follows good security practices for a non-profit government-supported initiative but can improve by formalizing incident response and enhancing header security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response information on the website.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing direct contact emails or phone numbers for organizational and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bündnis "Gemeinsam gegen Sexismus"
Description
Ziel des branchenübergreifenden Bündnisses ist es, Sexismus und sexuelle Belästigung zu erkennen, hinzusehen und wirksame Maßnahmen dagegen zu ergreifen.
Key services
Awareness raising, Providing resources and materials, Facilitating alliance membership, Promoting effective measures against sexism
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Plausible Analytics
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed, government-supported non-profit alliance against sexism.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and includes testimonials from reputable figures.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  5. Use of modern WordPress CMS with SEO and cookie management plugins.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Twitter is linked.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the main HTML; contact is via a contact page form.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with version 6.8.2, using reputable plugins like Yoast SEO and Borlabs Cookie for SEO and privacy compliance. It integrates Plausible Analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Hosting is managed via rzone.de name servers, consistent with the domain registration. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gemeinsam-gegen-sexismus.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gemeinsam-gegen-sexismus.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.