Skip to main content

Security report for geld.hr

GELD DATA d.o.o. · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GELD DATA d.o.o. is a Croatian ICT company specializing in software development, data collection, validation, and IT services, founded in 1992. The company positions itself as a regional player with expertise in business data analytics, GDPR compliance support, and virtual expertise services. Their website reflects a professional business focus targeting companies needing accurate and verified business data, particularly in the EU market. Technically, the site is built on Bitrix24 CMS with Bootstrap and integrates Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, though some accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, implementing security headers, and publishing incident response information to strengthen trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geld.hr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on data validation, enrichment, and GDPR compliance services. It targets businesses requiring verified B2B/B2C data and IT solutions, leveraging partnerships such as buyerFy.io and involvement in EU projects. GELD DATA's business model includes data quality checks, specialized databases, and virtual expertise services, positioning itself as a trusted data partner in South East Europe. The presence of VAT and registration numbers, along with a professional team and client logos, indicates a credible and established operation. Growth potential is supported by EU funding and strategic partnerships. The company maintains a moderate digital presence with integrated marketing tools but lacks explicit privacy and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are detected, the security posture would benefit from formalized policies, enhanced headers, and incident response information to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Audit and monitor third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security assessments to maintain a strong security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GELD DATA d.o.o.
VAT number
HR27972234767
Registration number
00268259
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GELD DATA d.o.o.
Description
GELD DATA d.o.o. is an ICT company focused on developing software solutions and providing IT services. Founded in 1992, it is an association of experienced IT professionals with long years of consulting experience, experience in designing numerous applications and solutions, and providing IT services in the state and private sector.
Key services
Data validation check, Completing specific data needs, Accurate database provision, GDPR support, Virtual expertise services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix24 CMS, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, jQuery (implied by Bitrix), Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework, Bootstrap
Platforms
Bitrix24
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Facebook Pixel for tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Bitrix24 CRM and marketing scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  4. Use of Bitrix24 CMS and Facebook Pixel indicates modern but basic marketing and CRM integration
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  6. Business appears legitimate and established with EU project involvement
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix24 CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. It leverages CDN hosting via Bitrix24 EU servers and integrates Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Modernization opportunities include implementing advanced security controls, improving accessibility, and enhancing privacy features to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geld.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geld.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.