Skip to main content

Security report for geberit.com

Geberit Gruppe · Manufacturing · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geberit Gruppe is a leading European manufacturer of sanitary products, recognized as a market leader with a comprehensive product portfolio including installation and flushing systems, piping systems, and bathroom systems. The company targets professionals in the sanitary industry, investors, media, and career seekers, emphasizing innovation, quality, and sustainability. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted on Microsoft Azure, and includes a consent management system for privacy compliance. Security headers are implemented; however, the SSL certificate is currently invalid, and no modern TLS protocols are enabled, which poses a security risk. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, but the SSL issues should be addressed promptly to enhance security and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geberit.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention geberit.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
485
Employees
33
Customers
381
Third parties
71
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for geberit.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –spec.geberit.com2026-05-28
  • –sts.geberit.com2026-05-26
  • –gin.geberit.com2026-05-24
  • –sts.geberit.com2026-05-24
  • –sts.geberit.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geberit operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on sanitary technology with a strong European market presence. The company leverages a broad product range and invests in research and development to maintain its competitive edge. Its business model includes direct sales, investor relations, and a strong emphasis on sustainability and corporate responsibility. The website's content and structure support these business goals, providing detailed information for various stakeholders. Social media integration and external links to investor reports and career pages indicate a well-rounded approach to stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security best practices with several security headers in place, including HSTS, X-XSS-Protection, and X-Content-Type-Options. However, the SSL certificate is invalid, and no TLS protocols are enabled, which is a critical security issue that significantly lowers the security posture score. There is no evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the content. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption features indicates room for improvement in SSL/TLS configuration. No explicit security or incident response policies were found on the site.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure the SSL certificate to ensure validity and enable TLS 1.2 or higher.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency.
  4. Maintain and update the consent management system to ensure ongoing privacy compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to avoid vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. It is hosted on Microsoft Azure, which provides robust infrastructure capabilities. The site includes a comprehensive set of meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Performance metrics were not available, but the site appears optimized for mobile devices and accessibility. The use of Usercentrics for cookie consent shows attention to privacy regulations. However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS support are significant technical risks that should be addressed urgently.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geberit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geberit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.