Skip to main content

Security report for gdprlocal.com

GDPR Local · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GDPR Local is a specialized service provider offering professional GDPR Article 27 EU Representative and data protection services. Founded in 2020, the company targets businesses needing to comply with EU data protection regulations, particularly those requiring an EU Representative under GDPR. The website presents a professional image with good content quality and SEO optimization, supporting multiple languages via Weglot. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, uses modern analytics tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, and is hosted with Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. However, explicit privacy and cookie policies are not detected in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but DNSSEC is not enabled. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche but should improve privacy compliance documentation and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gdprlocal.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the GDPR compliance services sector, focusing on providing mandatory EU Representative services under Article 27 GDPR. Its competitive advantage lies in quick setup, professional consultancy, and affordable pricing. The target customers are businesses outside the EU that process EU personal data and require compliance support. The company leverages a WordPress platform with SEO and multilingual capabilities to reach a broad audience. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The presence of testimonials and structured data indicates a focus on trust-building. The business model is service-oriented with consultancy and compliance support as revenue streams.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare as registrar and DNS provider, which adds a layer of security and reliability. The domain status clientTransferProhibited prevents unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers were detected in the provided content, suggesting room for improvement. The site uses third-party analytics and marketing scripts, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, indicating a potential compliance and transparency gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for transparency and support.
  4. Implement and publish security policies and incident response procedures to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve web security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GDPR Local
Registration number
company number 12969035
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GDPR Local
Description
Professional Article 27 GDPR Representatives. Set up your mandatory EU Representative service in minutes to ensure compliance with Article 27 of the GDPR. Great team, low price.
Key services
Article 27 GDPR EU Representative service, Data Protection consultancy, Compliance support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Weglot translation plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Sopro plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional GDPR compliance service provider focusing on Article 27 EU Representative services.
  2. Content is well structured with SEO optimization and multilingual support via Weglot.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and marketing scripts including Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No data protection officer contact information found.
  8. Domain is registered with Cloudflare, no DNSSEC enabled, domain status clientTransferProhibited.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with jQuery 3.7.1 and uses plugins such as Weglot for multilingual support and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Analytics are implemented via Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. Hosting and DNS are managed through Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure. The site shows good mobile optimization and moderate performance. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. The site lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gdprlocal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gdprlocal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.