Skip to main content

Security report for gcpglobal.com

Global Consulting Professionals S.A. de C.V. · Technology · Mexico

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ORCA GRC is a Mexico-based company specializing in Governance, Risk, and Compliance software solutions, supported by consulting services. The company targets multiple industries including finance, government, manufacturing, retail, telecommunications, and transportation. Their platform is ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certified, indicating a strong commitment to information security standards. The website is built on HubSpot CMS and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and trust indicators mitigate some risk. Overall, ORCA GRC presents as a credible mid-sized technology company with a solid market position in the GRC software sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gcpglobal.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ORCA GRC operates in a competitive market offering integrated risk and compliance management solutions tailored to diverse industries. Their business model combines SaaS with specialized consulting, enabling scalable adoption and ongoing client support. The company leverages certifications and client logos to build trust and differentiate itself. The website content and structure emphasize ease of adoption, flexibility, and comprehensive risk control, appealing to organizations seeking robust GRC solutions. The use of HubSpot and advanced analytics tools suggests a focus on inbound marketing and data-driven customer engagement. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data may warrant further investigation to confirm domain ownership and reduce potential reputational risks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of ISO-certified processes. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates room for improvement. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and trust. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and terms of service pages, potentially impacting GDPR adherence. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, suitable for a technology provider but with opportunities to strengthen defenses and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clearer contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Global Consulting Professionals S.A. de C.V.
Description
Integra y centraliza la gestión y control de los riegos empresariales con un software GRC que se implementa de forma sencilla y rápida.
Key services
Risk Management, Compliance Management, Audit Process Automation, Incident Management, Business Continuity Planning, Third Party Risk Management, Cybersecurity Management, Consulting Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, jQuery, Font Awesome
Frameworks
ISO 27001, ISO 27017
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of ISO certified processes
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Secure forms with HubSpot integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Ads Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing Automation
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive elements.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  3. Multiple calls to action for demo requests and contact forms integrated via HubSpot.
  4. Strong emphasis on ISO certifications and industry-specific solutions.
  5. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome, and multiple analytics/tracking services. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of multiple third-party scripts. The technical infrastructure is robust for marketing and content delivery but could benefit from improved security header implementation and accessibility enhancements. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical anomaly that should be addressed to avoid trust issues. Overall, the technical setup supports the business goals effectively but has room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gcpglobal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gcpglobal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.