Skip to main content

Security report for gaysexpool.cc

See PrivacyGuardian.org · Other · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

gaysexpool.cc is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of gay pornographic videos across multiple niche categories. The site targets an adults-only audience and operates primarily on an advertising-supported business model. The website offers multilingual access and a search feature to navigate its extensive video library. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and JavaScript, but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS identification. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with moderate loading speeds and limited accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no DNSSEC, no visible security headers, and intrusive JavaScript that may degrade user experience. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected with suspicious inconsistencies, reducing trustworthiness. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information is provided, further impacting credibility and compliance. Overall, the site functions as a niche adult content provider but lacks professional security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gaysexpool.cc

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector, focusing on gay pornographic content. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, as evidenced by multiple third-party ad networks embedded in the site. The extensive list of partner domains suggests a network of related adult sites, likely cross-promoting content. The lack of clear business registration or contact details limits transparency. The site targets adult consumers seeking free gay porn videos, with content in multiple languages to broaden reach. Growth indicators or revenue streams beyond advertising are not evident. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for adult sites but combined with inconsistent domain data raises questions about operational legitimacy. The partnership ecosystem appears extensive but informal, focusing on similar niche content sites.

Security posture

The security maturity of gaysexpool.cc is low. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers exposes the site to DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. The intrusive onbeforeunload JavaScript popup that forces navigation to another page is a poor security and user experience practice, potentially triggering browser security warnings or blocking. The site uses HTTPS (implied by URL) but no detailed SSL configuration data is available. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The extensive use of third-party ad scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security controls, privacy compliance, and user protection.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Remove or modify intrusive JavaScript onbeforeunload popups to improve user experience and reduce security risks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and abuse contacts to enhance trust and incident response capabilities.
  5. Review and audit third-party ad scripts for security and privacy compliance to reduce risk exposure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
See PrivacyGuardian.org
Description
gaysexpool.cc is an adult entertainment website offering a large collection of gay adult videos and pornographic content including various niche categories such as gay, boys, kinky, interracial, asian, european, fetish, and more.
Key services
Free streaming of adult gay porn videos, Video search functionality, Multilingual content access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
trusttraff.com, tsyndicate.com, a.topincome.cc, tapioni.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult gay pornographic video streaming site with extensive video content.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found on the site.
  3. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers provided.
  4. Site uses multiple third-party ad networks and scripts, which may impact privacy and security.
  5. Intrusive JavaScript popup on page unload attempts to redirect users to another page.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected with inconsistent domain creation date.
  8. Site content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and jQuery. No advanced frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. The site includes multiple third-party ad iframes and scripts from domains such as trusttraff.com, tsyndicate.com, and a.topincome.cc, indicating reliance on external advertising networks. The domain registrar is NameSilo, LLC, but hosting provider details are not explicit. The domain uses custom name servers on a related domain (gayxxxbox.cc). Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tags but no advanced responsive design detected. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site uses JavaScript to manipulate browser history and prevent back navigation, which may impact usability. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but lacks modern best practices and robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gaysexpool.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gaysexpool.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.