Skip to main content

Security report for gaudre.lt

Gaudrė, UAB · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gaudrė, UAB is a Lithuanian company specializing in lighting solutions for both residential and commercial clients, boasting over 20 years of industry experience. Their offerings include custom lighting projects, manufacturing of lighting fixtures, lighting control systems, and electrical installation services. The company maintains a strong market position in Lithuania with a professional portfolio of projects and partnerships with recognized brands. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and cookie consent management tools, ensuring a good user experience and compliance with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although security headers could be improved. The absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the website is a minor gap in business credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears privacy-protected, which is reasonable for this business type. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, supporting the company's reputable market presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gaudre.lt

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gaudre.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gaudre.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the manufacturing and real estate sectors, focusing on lighting design and installation for offices, retail, hospitality, and residential spaces. Their business model combines B2B and B2C approaches, leveraging a strong partnership ecosystem and an e-commerce platform for product sales. The website content and project portfolio indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a well-established brand in Lithuania. The company emphasizes innovation, quality, and design in its offerings, targeting businesses and homeowners seeking customized lighting solutions. Strategic partnerships with lighting brands and a web solution provider enhance their market reach and technical capabilities.

Security posture

Gaudrė's website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of cookie consent management via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. The use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel is managed with user consent, reflecting privacy-aware practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS is a potential area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for enhancing security transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business scale but could be strengthened to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced via external libraries.
  5. Consider adding visible company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to strengthen business credibility and customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gaudrė, UAB
Description
Apšvietimo ekspertai. Daugiau nei 20 metų patirtis taikant apšvietimo sprendimus verslui ir namams.
Key services
Lighting design and projects for offices and business centers, Lighting for retail spaces, Public space lighting, Hotel, restaurant and SPA lighting, Industrial lighting, Facade and outdoor lighting, Home interior lighting, Lighting fixtures manufacturing, Lighting control systems, Electrical installation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery UI, Fancybox, Google Fonts (Barlow), Cookiebot, Tiny Slider (tns), Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on lighting solutions for business and residential clients.
  3. Comprehensive project portfolio and partner representation.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and visible.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limits; domain privacy likely enabled.
  8. Use of common marketing and analytics tools with consent management.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery UI, Fancybox, Google Fonts, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Tiny Slider for project carousels, and tracking scripts for Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks some advanced security headers and accessibility features but overall demonstrates a solid technical foundation suitable for a medium-sized enterprise.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gaudre.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gaudre.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.